跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

采集已暂停
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+0已有论文修订
+0新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:等待完成 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-02 00:39各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-03 16:26 — 2026-11-04 16:26(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:尚未完成最近发现新增版本:2026-11-02 00:39库内论文最新更新时间:2026-10-30 01:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

8,677 已收录论文7,675 AI 相关1,866 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序等待首次采集
新论文 · v1arXiv:2610.39246

IMRouter: Imbalance-aware Temporal Pattern Routing for LLM-based Time Series Forecasting

Xin Yang, Cai Xu, Haishun Chen, Ying Liu, Jie Zhao, Wei Zhao, Ziyu Guan

Accurate time series forecasting (TSF) is essential for Web applications, such as traffic monitoring and online resource management. Recent advances in leveraging pre-trained large language models (LLMs) have shown promising performance in TSF. However, existing LLM-based TSF methods largely optimize the overall forecasting objective while overlooking temporal pattern imbalance (TPI), where different temporal patterns occur at highly unequal frequencies. Our empirical analysis reveals that TPI is prevalent across widely used TSF benchmarks, with substantially higher forecasting errors on less frequent patterns. To address this issue, we propose IMRouter (Imbalance-aware Temporal Pattern Routing), a novel framework that mitigates TPI-induced biases in both temporal representation learning and cross-modal alignment. Specifically, IMRouter introduces Pattern-Adaptive Temporal Representation Learning (PATR), which leverages gradient conflict and local gradient density to guide expert specialization. By penalizing incompatible expert assignments with density-aware weighting, PATR reduces the dominance of frequent optimization signals in router training. Furthermore, Routing-Guided Semantic Alignment (RGSA) transfers the pattern-specific knowledge learned by the router to cross-modal alignment through mutual information maximization, preserving distinctive temporal information across different patterns. Extensive experiments on benchmark datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of IMRouter, particularly in improving forecasting performance on less frequent temporal patterns.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.LG
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2511.06411Google Research

SofT-GRPO:通过 Gumbel 重参数化软思考策略优化超越离散 Token 大语言模型强化学习

SofT-GRPO: Surpassing Discrete-Token LLM Reinforcement Learning via Gumbel-Reparameterized Soft-Thinking Policy Optimization

Zhi Zheng, Yu Gu, Wei Liu, Yee Whye Teh, Wee Sun Lee

AI 速览:提出 SofT-GRPO 算法,用 Gumbel 噪声与重参数化技巧将 GRPO 强化学习扩展到软思考推理模式,并在 1.5B–7B 基座模型上报告了相对离散 Token GRPO 的小幅 Pass@1 提升与更明显的 Pass@32 提升。

The soft-thinking paradigm for Large Language Model (LLM) reasoning can outperform the conventional discrete-token Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning in some scenarios, underscoring its research and application value. However, while the discrete-token CoT reasoning pattern can be reinforced through policy optimization algorithms such as group relative policy optimization (GRPO), extending the soft-thinking pattern with Reinforcement Learning (RL) remains challenging. This difficulty stems from the complexities of injecting stochasticity into soft-thinking tokens and updating soft-thinking policies accordingly. As a result, previous attempts to combine soft-thinking with GRPO typically underperform their discrete-token GRPO counterparts. To fully unlock the potential of soft-thinking, this paper presents a novel policy optimization algorithm, SofT-GRPO, to reinforce LLMs under the soft-thinking reasoning pattern. SofT-GRPO injects the Gumbel noise into logits, employs the Gumbel-Softmax technique to avoid soft-thinking tokens outside the pre-trained embedding space, and leverages the reparameterization trick in policy gradient. We conduct experiments across base LLMs ranging from 1.5B to 7B parameters, and results demonstrate that SofT-GRPO enables soft-thinking LLMs to slightly outperform discrete-token GRPO on Pass@1 (+0.13% on average accuracy), while exhibiting a substantial uplift on Pass@32 (+2.19% on average accuracy). Codes and weights are available on https://github.com/zz1358m/SofT-GRPO-master

cs.AI · cs.LG
arXiv ↗PDF ↗