让下一篇重要论文，不再错过。

Large language models (LLMs) are widely used in text-to-image (T2I) systems, but they are typically limited to text encoding, while denoising is handled by newly trained generative backbones. The emergence of representation autoencoders (RAEs) shifts the generation target toward semantically structured visual representations, creating a latent space that is more compatible with pretrained LLM priors. Inspired by multimodal LLMs (MLLMs), where an MLP projector is sufficient to align clean visual representations with a pretrained LLM, we repurpose the MLLM itself as a noisy representation encoder, extending this mechanism from clean to noisy inputs. We present RepFusion, which uses the resulting MLLM outputs as the conditioning signal for a diffusion transformer. In controlled comparisons at similar inference budgets, RepFusion outperforms baselines that devote comparable capacity to newly initialized denoisers. Reusing MLLM outputs across denoising steps further accelerates inference while retaining performance comparable to per-step MLLM recomputation. These results demonstrate that MLLMs provide strong priors for denoising visual representations.

Time series analytics has been widely applied across various domains. While existing time series foundation models (TSFMs) have demonstrated promising results, they still face two major challenges: 1) Most TSFMs mainly rely on stacking Transformer layers to increase parameter size, lacking the ability to adaptively model complex time series patterns from multi-domain data. 2) Current TSFMs are primarily pre-trained for specific tasks, e.g., forecasting or anomaly detection, and a few models support multiple tasks, but they fail to fully leverage task specificity and commonality, resulting in suboptimal performance. To address these challenges, we propose TimeSeek, a novel generalized time series analytics model that adaptively models time series patterns from multi-domain data and unifies multiple tasks in pre-training. Conceptually, TimeSeek is guided by selective information sharing under domain and task heterogeneity. From the perspective of multi-domain data, we propose a Multi-Domain Feature Extractor that adaptively captures temporal dependencies and channel correlations based on domain-specific characteristics, including progressive multi-scale modeling and adaptive slot channel modeling. From the perspective of the diversity of tasks, we propose multi-task collaborative training, which leverages task specificity and task commonality through task customization and cross-task training, effectively unifying multiple tasks in pre-training and better adapting to diverse downstream scenarios. After pre-training on large-scale time series data, TimeSeek achieves state-of-the-art performance in forecasting, anomaly detection, and classification tasks across both few-shot learning and zero-shot situations, together with favorable inference efficiency.

Neural networks are increasingly studied not merely as predictive systems, but as complex systems whose internal computations are themselves objects of scientific inquiry. Recent progress in mechanistic interpretability (MI) has made it possible to identify neurons, features, circuits, population structures, and dynamical patterns associated with model behavior. As these tools improve, attention is shifting from what can be observed inside a model to how those observations support mechanistic explanations. We examine the parallel efforts of neuroscience and MI to address this question and identify recurring inferential bottlenecks when inferring mechanisms from complex neural systems. We propose five principles and organize them into a recursive logic for a more rigorous procedure of mechanistic inference. These principles provide a framework that supports scientific discovery in two senses: it helps turn local interpretability findings into cumulative knowledge of mechanisms within models, and it makes those mechanisms sufficiently precise to generate testable hypotheses about domains beyond the models. Evidence beyond MI is ultimately required to establish what model mechanisms reveal about the world.

Visual Question Answering (VQA) imposes substantial computational overhead on vision-language models (VLMs), motivating model-agnostic input reduction methods that can be readily applied across diverse VLMs, including in black-box settings. Simply enforcing a visual-token cap reduces computation, but it can discard information needed to answer the question. A single reduction strategy also struggles to accommodate different scenarios. Our key observation is that cropping and compression are complementary: cropping highlights small targets and local details, whereas whole-image compression better preserves context for large targets or distributed evidence. Based on this observation, we propose C$^2$-Routing, which adaptively selects cropping or compression according to the input image and question. Since both strategies may still discard key information, we further design a safety gate that uses the predicted joint correctness distribution under original and reduced inputs to guide fallback and protect accuracy. To accommodate consumer GPU resource constraints, all training and evaluation experiments run on RTX 3090 GPUs. To measure gains beyond token capping, we use full-image baselines with the same cap of 1,024 visual tokens. We conduct extensive evaluation on three VLMs and 18 datasets spanning local details, global scenes, scene text, and documents. With the visual budget already capped, C$^2$-Routing further reduces end-to-end FLOPs by 36.53% and visual tokens by 42.36% on average, with a mean relative task-score decrease of only 0.77%.

We describe our solution for the 2026 BEHAVIOR Challenge: 100 long-horizon household tasks in the OmniGibson simulator. We placed 9th on the final leaderboard, the only independent team in the top 10. The core of the solution is a single vision-language-action (VLA) model, one checkpoint for all 100 tasks, built on our 1st-place 2025 solution, which is based on $π_{0.5}$. On the 50 tasks shared with 2025, its Q rises from 0.260 to 0.371; across all 100 tasks it scores 0.392. Our main conclusion from 2025 was that the model was undertrained, so most of the 2026 work went into training the model for longer, optimizing some training parameters, making each training step slightly faster and reducing the gradient noise: a migration from 50 to 100 tasks (semantic stages built from the demonstrations' skill annotations, task and stage embeddings of new tasks warm-started from similar old ones, and a 21-dimensional action space matching the teleoperation controls); variance-reduced multi-sample flow matching with a simple noise-vs-compute model that picks the number of action-expert samples per observation without ablations; and a 200k-step training run, about one pass over the 211M frames of the demonstrations. A cloud evaluation infrastructure keeps a shared record with provenance, episode diagnostics and restorable simulator states, and runs six simulators on one GPU together faster than real time. On top of the learned policy, 14 tasks are routed to a GPT-6 Astra coding agent that controls the robot through observation and motion tools, starting every episode from a frozen copy of its own practice session on training instances. Across these 14 tasks, Astra's mean Q is 0.639, against 0.108 for the learned policy. The public submission included only part of the Astra results and scored 0.446 Q with 27.3% full-task success.

Operator learning for partial differential equations (PDEs) on arbitrary geometries builds fast neural surrogates for large-scale simulation. While recent geometry-adaptive neural operators have made substantial progress, they are mainly designed for forward problems in which inputs and outputs share the same spatial domain. This limits their applicability for boundary value problems (BVPs) and inverse problems, where inputs and outputs may live on different domains. We introduce the Geometry-Adaptive Integral Autoencoder (GAIA), an operator learning model that encodes the domain boundary and the interior field distribution into geometry tokens, and conditions integral transform layers on these tokens via cross-attention, allowing the kernel to adapt locally to geometric features. This yields an architecture capable of learning solution operators for forward and inverse problems on arbitrary domains, solving each in a single pass at inference without per-domain optimization, iterative refinement, or graph construction. We evaluate GAIA on seven 2D and 3D benchmarks, four of which are new or substantially extended benchmarks for inverse problems and BVP: electrical impedance tomography, optical tomography, 3D Darcy flow on varying geometries, and a modified setting of the Poisson BVP on mechanical components benchmark (MCB). GAIA sets new state-of-the-art results on every inverse and BVP task, reducing median relative $L^2$ error by 64% on airfoil flow reconstruction and 22% on EIT relative to the next best amortized method, and outperforming all baselines on every shape category of MCB. On other forward problems, GAIA is competitive with specialized solvers while maintaining stable accuracy across point resolutions on which transformer-based baselines degrade.

Neural Processes (NPs) are flexible meta-learning models capable of uncertainty quantification across diverse applications. However, the standard NP framework assumes access to noise-free inputs. This is unrealistic in many practical settings, where sensor noise or measurement errors are unavoidable. This discrepancy between model assumptions and real-world data can significantly degrade prediction quality and uncertainty estimates. We introduce Denoising Neural Processes (DnNPs), a principled extension of the NP framework that explicitly models input uncertainty. We train DnNPs via variational inference. DnNPs jointly learn to denoise corrupted inputs and perform meta-learning, making them robust to noisy training data. We demonstrate DnNPs' effectiveness on both synthetic and real-world datasets, showing consistent improvements in prediction and uncertainty quantification compared to standard NPs. On PM2.5 spatial interpolation from real-world air quality sensors, DnNP reduces RMSE by up to 30% and NLL by up to 73% relative to standard NPs. We also provide theoretical grounding: we show that the Bayes-optimal predictor under noisy inputs belongs to the DnNP model class, and that plug-in models with fixed observation variance incur an irreducible KL divergence gap that DnNP provably avoids.

Video world models promise general-purpose interactive simulators, but their training is limited by action supervision: action labels are scarce, fragmented across incompatible specifications, and do not scale with the unlabeled video pretraining corpus. A common workaround jointly trains an action encoder to compress consecutive frames into a latent action and a decoder to reconstruct the next frame from the previous frame and that latent, forcing the latent to capture only new information. This has two limitations: learning the action space from scratch can limit generalization to unseen domains, and the bottleneck trades expressiveness for separation, with tighter settings losing nuance and looser ones risking scene leakage under domain shifts. We argue for a different starting point: rather than learning actions from scratch, we start from a pretrained foundation model (V-JEPA 2), whose embeddings of a frame pair already carry substantial action information after large-scale, diverse video pretraining. The remaining challenge is to extract the action while discarding the scene. We propose a label-free contrastive adaptation framework that pulls together frame pairs sharing the same motion under a different scene and pushes apart pairs from the same scene with different motion, reshaping the geometry of the pretrained space without imposing a reconstruction bottleneck. We introduce a unified evaluation protocol along three axes (action expressiveness, scene invariance, and action-conditioned video generation quality) across robot manipulation, camera navigation, game, and driving benchmarks, most of which are unseen during adaptation. Compared with annotation-free latent-action methods, our representations are substantially more expressive while matching their scene invariance, and they yield world models that transfer demonstrated actions to new scenes more faithfully.

AI systems have become increasingly capable of dangerous behaviours in many domains. This raises the question: Do models sometimes choose to violate human instructions in order to perform behaviour that is more useful for certain goals? We introduce a benchmark for measuring model propensity for instrumental convergence (IC) behaviour in terminal-based agents. This is behaviour such as self-preservation that has been hypothesised to play a key role in risks from highly capable AI agents. Our benchmark is realistic and low-stakes, aiming to reduce evaluation-awareness and roleplay confounds. The suite contains seven operational tasks, each with an official workflow and a shortcut whose policy status varies by condition. An eight-variant shared framework varies monitoring, instruction clarity, stakes, permission, instrumental usefulness and blocked honest paths to support inferences regarding the factors driving IC behaviour. We evaluated ten models using deterministic environment-state scorers over 1,680 samples, with trace review employed for audit and adjudication purposes. The adjusted IC rate is 86 out of 1,680 samples (5.1%). IC behaviour is concentrated rather than uniform: two Gemini models account for 66.3% of IC cases and three tasks account for 84.9%. Conditions in which IC behaviour is indispensable for task success result in the greatest increase in the adjusted IC rate (+15.7 percentage points), whereas emphasising that task success is critical or certain framing choices do not produce comparable effects. Our findings indicate that realistic, low-nudge environments elicit IC behaviour rarely but systematically in most tested models. We conclude that it is feasible to robustly measure tendencies for dangerous behaviour in current frontier AI agents.

Fetal brain biometry provides a quantitative basis for assessing prenatal growth and identifying congenital brain abnormalities. However, comprehensive assessment remains limited by labor-intensive manual measurements and automated models that lose accuracy across imaging sequences and institutions. We introduce BioTTA, an anatomically guided test-time adaptation framework that measures 11 fetal brain biometrics from reconstructed three-dimensional magnetic resonance images. BioTTA adapts pretrained models to individual unlabeled volumes using geometric consistency and atlas priors, without access to source images. In a retrospective study across five centers in China and Switzerland, BioTTA improved measurement accuracy across three out-of-distribution datasets and two network architectures. It reduced mean absolute measurement errors by 46-82% relative to the corresponding models without adaptation, achieving errors similar to those of supervised fine-tuning. Its measurements were mapped onto normative growth trajectories derived from expert annotations, enabling gestational-age-specific assessment through a web-based reporting platform. Across four disease cohorts, the platform achieved 82.1-95.0% accuracy in binary detection of ventriculomegaly or cerebellar abnormalities, with performance similar to that of a senior radiologist. BioTTA provides a practical foundation for standardized fetal brain biometry across heterogeneous imaging settings, supporting scalable prenatal growth assessment and quantitative evaluation of brain abnormalities.

Low-rank adaptation (LoRA) is the de facto method for parameter-efficient fine-tuning of large neural networks, achieving strong task adaptation with minimal trainable parameters and low optimization cost. Beyond this efficiency, practitioners have observed two striking properties: \textit{robustness to catastrophic forgetting} and the ability to \textit{merge independently trained adapters} into a single model that performs competitively across multiple tasks. These properties are central to continual and multi-task learning, yet remain poorly understood. In this work, we provide a theoretical explanation through a unified \textit{margin-based perspective}. We analyze LoRA in multiclass linear classification under a near-orthogonal task regime with $\ell_2$-regularization, and characterize the optimal LoRA adapter across regularization regimes. Our analysis shows that, in an intermediate regime of regularization parameters, the optimal adapter aligns with the \emph{max-margin solution} on the fine-tuning data. Building on this characterization, we derive two key consequences. First, we obtain closed-form expressions for the margins on pre-training and fine-tuning data, revealing a precise margin trade-off: the regularization parameter controls the balance between retention and adaptation. Second, we analyze adapter merging, proving that merged models achieve positive margin on each task and deriving optimal mixing coefficients that balance margins across tasks and maximize the margin over their union. These results lead to a simple, training-free merging rule, which we term \textit{margin-based LoRA merging} (MaLoRA). Experiments on modern architectures and real datasets validate our theoretical predictions, showing that MaLoRA matches or outperforms several adapter-merging baselines across a range of vision and language classification tasks.

We study approximately stable committee selection under approval preferences, following Cheng et al.~[EC~2019] and Jiang, Munagala, and Wang~[STOC~2020]. In an approval-based committee election, $n$ voters each approve a subset of the candidates, and a committee of size $k$ is selected. A size-$k$ committee is $λ$-stable if, for every nonempty subset $T$ of candidates, the number of voters who strictly prefer $T$ is less than $λ$ times the proportional share $\frac{n|T|}{k}$. We consider sequential Phragmén, a classical polynomial-time voting rule, and prove that it always returns a $2$-stable committee. This implies that the $2$-core is always nonempty and improves upon the $3.651$-stability guarantee of Gao, Sun, and Vondrák~[EC~2026]. The guarantee also extends to weighted voters and is tight even for unweighted elections: for every $1\leλ<2$, sequential Phragmén can return a committee that is not $λ$-stable. Compared with the exact-core algorithm developed in concurrent work by Becker, Greger, and Peters~[arXiv~2026], sequential Phragmén is simpler to implement, and our proof of its $2$-stability is elementary.

Pretrained video diffusion models (VDMs) offer a powerful foundation for World Action Models (WAMs), which jointly predict robot actions and future observations. Building such models requires injecting low-dimensional robot signals (e.g. proprioception, actions, and values) into a latent space shaped by natural videos, and a key design choice is the interface through which these signals enter: existing schemes treat it as a formatting detail, spending a separate latent frame on each signal or bolting on dedicated encoders and decoders. We argue that signal injection is instead a distribution-alignment problem: how well a representation matches the prior of the pretrained VDMs during denoising. Using the relative reconstruction error of a frozen VDM denoiser as a probe, we find that conventional spatial encodings sit far off this prior, whereas frequency-domain packing yields latents that the denoiser corrects far less. Motivated by this diagnostic result, we propose MetaWAM, which folds all robot signals into a single unified meta-frame: each signal is assigned to a disjoint frequency-domain channel band and lifted to the spatial latent by an inverse DCT, yielding a decodable interface aligned with the pretrained VDM prior without any added module or architectural change. A fixed band layout together with slot-aware routing lets the same meta-frame support policy, world-model, and value prediction over a shared set of robot variables. On RoboCasa, MetaWAM reaches 68.9% success while collapsing the per-signal frames into one and cutting inference latency by 39%, and attains 85.0% success on three real-world Franka tasks. Code and models are available at https://github.com/showlab/MetaWAM

Research agents achieve increasingly strong benchmark scores, yet these scores do not necessarily translate into reliable delivery in ongoing research projects. Many research-agent benchmarks emphasize standalone tasks and relatively self-contained workflows in clean or curated workspaces. However, researchers ask agents to complete one step within an ongoing project, where requests depend on earlier session decisions and workspaces contain unfinished files, outdated versions, and failed attempts. We introduce ARE-bench to evaluate whether research agents advance ongoing projects while respecting prior decisions and existing workspace state, grounded in real session context and in-progress workspaces. ARE-bench includes 75 tasks built on agent sessions and full workspaces from recruited researchers' own projects, spanning seven research stages, 33 requirements, and 150 sub-requirements, with 1,173 binary checklist items in total. Each task is anchored at a real user request, preserves its requirements, and summarizes the earlier requests still in effect as background. The complete workspace is replayed to that boundary without cleanup, preserving artifacts from earlier turns. Each checklist is compiled from an intent-aligned rubric and credits any valid solution. Across seven frontier models, the strongest passes every checklist item on only 66.2% of tasks, and Design and Execution rank among the hardest stages for every model. Three models pass about 69% of tasks when only delivery contracts and general norms are checked, but just 28.4% to 40.0% once historical and material or workspace requirements are also checked. Evaluating delivery without these contextual requirements can therefore overestimate research agents and mask differences between them.

Masked Diffusion Models (MDMs) are well known for fast text generation via parallel decoding. However, independent parallel sampling can commit to inconsistent predictions, and less is known about how to selectively revise these early token commitments. In this work, we introduce $\underline{\mathrm{P}}$lanned $\underline{\mathrm{U}}$nmasking-and-$\underline{\mathrm{R}}$evision Joint $\underline{\mathrm{L}}$earning (PURL) for MDMs, a training-based framework that seamlessly unifies parallel generation with selective token revision. We derive a normalized joint transition whose likelihood factorizes into edit selection, unmask selection, and token prediction. These components are trained jointly on partially masked sequences constructed according to the model's own unmasking policy. During inference, all three decisions are supported by a single shared forward pass, enabling the model to decode masked tokens and revise noisy tokens. Across logic puzzles, mathematical reasoning, and code generation, PURL improves accuracy at matched unmask budgets, with relative gains up to 47.4% accuracy improvement and up to an $8\times$ reduction in scheduled decoding rounds. Beyond these gains, our analysis further reveals general principles of revisable decoding: token edits become more effective as context accumulates; early edits can steer unfinished trajectories, whereas later edits tend to remain localized; and effective edits therefore depend on both calibrating when to intervene and learning where and how to revise. Together, these suggest that effective parallel generation depends not on revising more tokens, but on making the right commitments revisable at the right time.

Rapidly evolving LLM architectures and heterogeneous mobile hardware make supporting new models in on-device inference engines a recurring and costly system challenge. Each model may require coordinated changes across conversion, graph construction, operators, and hardware backends. Existing coding agents often miss these cross-layer dependencies and struggle to diagnose failures across host--device execution paths. We present EngineAgent, an agentic system for automating on-device LLM model enablement. Its key insight is to separate reusable engine and hardware knowledge from model-specific implementation. Before enablement, EngineAgent constructs a hierarchy-aware engine index that captures engine abstraction layers and cross-layer dependencies, and pre-validates backend-specific build, execution, and debugging workflows using already supported models. For each new model, a builder uses this knowledge to coordinate cross-layer changes, while an auditor checks implementation completeness and drives iterative debugging through device-side validation. Across 12 tasks spanning three mobile LLMs and four engine--backend pairs on CPUs, GPUs, and NPUs, EngineAgent achieves 75% end-to-end success with either of two underlying LLMs, versus 33.3% for the strongest coding-agent baseline. Success requires compilation, on-device execution, and output-logit agreement with reference implementations. EngineAgent also reduces average per-task time and model-API cost relative to baselines using the same underlying LLMs.

Users often complain that AI assistants such as ChatGPT are getting worse. Some versions do change, but human evaluation leaves a second possibility untested: the people judging may change. We separate the two on Chatbot Arena, a public platform where people compare answers from two anonymous large language models (LLMs) and pick the better one or say both are bad. We study 1,260,967 blind votes cast from May 2023 to August 2024 on pairs of models whose versions are fixed: dated vendor snapshots and models with fixed open weights. For the same pair of unchanged models, the share of votes saying "both are bad" rises by 1.71 percentage points a month on a mean of 17.1%, and by 1.91 points a month in 2024. In fourteen pairs observed often in both 2023 and 2024, it rose in every one, from 15.5% to 23.3%. The ranking does not trend: in 2024, the stronger model's share of decisive votes is flat. The rise holds within the same voter and on the same pair, and across arrival cohorts from their first recorded vote. It holds with prompt controls, in every major language, for dated vendor snapshots, open-weight models and models with stable answer length, and between interface changes. The drift is shared across models: month effects estimated from other models' pairs remove it from each model's own pairs. Platform-wide, the average model would be expected to score 78% against the 2023 average, yet the share of "both are bad" votes ended near where it began. The pattern fits a standard that follows the category's progress, so a product that stands still is judged as declining. Absolute verdicts on AI drifted while relative comparisons held steady, an evaluation drift that matters for LLM leaderboards and for the human feedback used to train models.

Stochastic diffusion samplers often require substantially more neural function evaluations (NFEs) than deterministic samplers to achieve comparable sample quality. Although higher-order discretization accelerates deterministic sampling, its benefits for stochastic sampling remains unclear. We establish matching upper and worst-case lower bounds showing that stochastic samplers with higher-order approximations remain first-order convergent, even with exact score functions. Thus, increasing the approximation order does not generally improve the convergence order. Motivated by this limitation, we introduce forward-value discretization, a training-free framework that evaluates the data/noise prediction model at a lookahead estimate constructed from previous predictions. For deterministic sampling, the resulting Forward DPMSolver (F-DPMSolver), improves sample quality at low NFE budgets through its DDIM-based variant, despite remaining first-order convergent. For stochastic sampling, we develop Forward DDPM (F-DDPM), which evaluates the model at a cleaner lookahead point adjusted for subsequent noise injection. This estimate reuses both the previous model prediction and the previously injected noise. Both variants admit first-order convergence guarantees with one model evaluation per iteration. Across CIFAR-10, ImageNet, FFHQ, and LSUN, F-DDPM consistently achieves lower FID than the evaluated stochastic baselines at matched NFE budgets. With 1.5 times as many NFEs as deterministic baselines, it achieves competitive sample quality, narrowing the practical efficiency gap between stochastic and deterministic sampling. Code is available at https://github.com/Na-Li66/F-DDPM.

LLM agents increasingly operate in long-horizon, verifier-rich environments, but current self-improvement mechanisms often write episode-derived lessons directly into memory, making local success an unreliable signal for reusable and safe knowledge. This paper addresses the core question of when an experience-derived behavioral update should be admitted into persistent agent state. We propose Falsification-Gated Self-Evolution (FGSE), a verifier-grounded framework that represents each candidate lesson as a structured hypothesis with an explicit precondition, behavior change, expected effect, and verifier. FGSE applies the hypothesis only in a temporary state, tests it on target-transfer, falsification, and archived-regression probes, and then commits, refines, or rejects it according to measured gain and risk. Across web, app, tool-use, and long-term memory benchmarks, FGSE achieves strong task performance, including 39.8 WebArena success rate, 78.8 AppWorld average completion, and 0.724/0.487 Pass$^1$ on $τ$-Retail/$τ$-Airline, while reducing falsification failures to 5.0%, regression damage to 1.3%, and harmful committed updates to 3.6%. These results suggest that testing memory updates as hypotheses supports more reliable long-term adaptation.

System-1 Decision Models directly make structured probabilistic decisions over query-specified options given a state in a single forward pass, without autoregressively generating reasoning trajectories or textual responses. Recent evaluations cover diverse tasks but often rely on existing benchmarks, where prior exposure to test material can obscure generalization. Moreover, real-world decision making often involves long contexts, large option spaces, and complex logical dependencies, challenges that existing benchmarks do not adequately capture together. Thus, we introduce MMDM (Massive Multitask Decision Making), a benchmark of 5,448 high-quality questions across 16 task categories, combining newly constructed tasks with source-grounded recompositions and rewrites for single-select, multi-select, and soft-label decision making in fresh contexts. It covers realistic scenarios such as agent state tracking, tool and skill selection, preference judgments, and rubric scoring, with option spaces ranging from 2 to 1,024 and inputs extending to 64,817 tokens. With MMDM, we conduct a comprehensive quantitative evaluation of 28 decision models, showing that many perform well on common knowledge yet struggle with interdependent options, constrained decisions, and multi-select tasks. For example, Perplexity Decider-V1.2 reaches 78.75% Hard Single-select Accuracy on world knowledge, but only 53.95% on option logic and 47.95% on constraint planning, while the best Hard Multi-select Accuracy across all models is 36.81%. These results highlight joint reasoning, constraint-aware selection, and complete multi-select recovery as key priorities for decision model development, with MMDM providing a testbed for measuring this progress.

Streaming multi-reference video generation establishes a scene from specified people and objects, then continues it under changing instructions. We introduce TaoMate-R1, a streaming multi-reference generator that organizes adaptation parameters through temporal role specialization. It assigns separate low-rank adapters to scene establishment and continuation on a frozen backbone. Each adapter performs both denoising and context writing for its role; Self Gradient Forcing jointly trains the roles through the history they construct. This allocation contrasts with operation-based specialization, which separates denoising from context writing across all chunks. A fixed-replay gradient analysis characterizes the update directions admitted by the two sharing schemes. On 32 multi-reference cases, we compare the schemes at the same two-adapter budget. Across ten approximately two-minute streams with changing instructions and shared teacher-audio conditioning, TaoMate-R1 reduces the mean boundary luminance jump from 1.96 to 0.613, with higher boundary feature similarity. It also achieves higher mean CLIP and DINO temporal similarity across short interactions, long streams, and public reference compositions. These results support grouping adaptation parameters by scene establishment and continuation for streaming multi-reference generation. Our code and model are released at https://github.com/TaoLiveAIGC/TaoMate-H3.

Evaluating candidate parallelization strategies through distributed training runs makes strategy selection prohibitively expensive at scale. Performance simulation offers a lower cost alternative, yet controlled comparisons among existing simulators remain difficult because they differ in the training stages they model and the workloads on which they are evaluated. We introduce LM-SimBench, a unified framework, profiling dataset, and benchmark for evaluating LLM training simulators. The framework decomposes simulation into functional stages from model compilation to schedule level aggregation, connecting execution representations and cost estimators to measurable evaluation targets. Following this framework, we profile 23 model settings from 10 dense and Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) LLM families on an Ascend Neural Processing Unit (NPU) cluster. The resulting dataset contains 348 feasible configurations that jointly vary five parallelism dimensions and activation recomputation, with six views spanning configuration, rank, operator, event, and kernel granularity. Evaluations of representative training simulators demonstrate how LM-SimBench supports comparisons of prediction accuracy, assessment of configuration selection, and diagnosis of prediction errors. Matched GPU-NPU experiments validate the cross-platform applicability of the collection and evaluation protocol and demonstrate NPU-guided GPU configuration selection.

Remote-sensing foundation models increasingly unify representations across sensing modalities and downstream tasks, yet their prediction mechanisms remain largely task-specific. Separate decoders, prediction heads, and objectives leave prediction fragmented across tasks. This naturally raises a question: can heterogeneous remote-sensing tasks share the prediction process? UniFlow-RS answers this question with a single latent flow-matching predictor shared across tasks. This requires addressing two key challenges: unifying heterogeneous prediction spaces and harmonizing joint optimization across tasks. First, we cast heterogeneous task outputs into structured visual targets in a common latent space, allowing them to be modeled by the same pretrained flow predictor. Task-dependent conditioning further accommodates differences in input configurations. Second, we optimize all tasks with a common Flow Matching objective, eliminating task-specific prediction losses. To mitigate optimization mismatch across tasks and modalities, we introduce Task-Modality Adaptive Timestep Sampling (TMAS), which dynamically allocates training timesteps according to the online learning state of each task-modality group. Using a single shared model, UniFlow-RS handles six tasks and thirteen datasets, surpassing recent task-specific state-of-the-art methods on several benchmarks while remaining competitive on the others. Beyond these benchmarks, the same checkpoint demonstrates strong zero-shot transfer across unseen datasets, task settings, occlusion conditions, and near-infrared false-color imagery, without target-specific adaptation.

Long-horizon embodied tasks require agents to learn, reason, and generalize robustly across complex real-world environments. However, existing approaches often struggle with partial observability, fragmented spatial reasoning, and inefficient integration of heterogeneous memories, limiting their capacity for long-horizon adaptation. To address this, we introduce RoboMemory, a brain-inspired framework that unifies Temporal, Spatial, Semantic, and Episodic memory for efficient long-horizon planning and interactive learning. Its core innovations are a comprehensive memory system designed for embodied tasks, and a dynamic spatial knowledge graph for scalable, consistent memory updates. Extensive experiments on EmbodiedBench show that RoboMemory improves the average success rate of Qwen2.5-VL-72B-Ins by 26.5 percentage points and achieves performance comparable to strong closed-source VLM agents. Real-world trials further suggest RoboMemory's potential for interactive environmental learning by reusing accumulated experience across repeated task attempts. These results demonstrate RoboMemory as a scalable memory-augmented framework for embodied agents, improving long-horizon planning and cumulative learning in complex interactive environments.

We study integer programs in standard form $\min\{\mathbf{c}^{\mathsf T}\mathbf{x}:A\mathbf{x}=\mathbf{b},\mathbf{l}\leq\mathbf{x}\leq\mathbf{u},\ \mathbf{x}\in\mathbb{Z}^n\}$, where $A\in\mathbb{Z}^{d\times n}$, all entries of $\mathbf{b},\mathbf{c},\mathbf{l},\mathbf{u}$ are integers, and every variable bound is finite. Let $N$ be an upper bound on the absolute values of the entries of $A$, and $c_{\max}$ one on the absolute values of the costs. For every fixed $d$ and every fixed $\varepsilon>0$ we give a deterministic algorithm running in time \[ T_{\textrm LP}+O_d(n)+O_{d,\varepsilon}\bigl(N^{2d+\varepsilon}\log^2(c_{\max}+2)\bigr), \] where $T_{\textrm LP}$ is the time to solve one linear programming relaxation exactly. Prior to our work, the best known running time for bounded variables was $N^{O(d^2)}$ [Eisenbrand \& Weismantel'20], and it has been a fundamental open problem whether the exponent $O(d^2)$ can be improved to one linear in $d$. We answer this question affirmatively, with the exponent $2d+\varepsilon$.

A representation that accurately predicts a deformable object's response is not necessarily the one most useful for choosing manipulation actions. We study this distinction between predictive utility and decision utility in planar single-grasp shape control of Deformable Linear Objects (DLOs). As a common decision backbone, we introduce Geometry-Pointer-Flow (GPF), a geometry-grounded policy that separates grasp-location selection from grasp-conditioned motion generation. Its geometry-only variant reduces one-step executed shape error by 32.8% relative to a DLO-specific diffusion policy, while using 18.7 times fewer parameters and achieving approximately 193 times faster inference. On this backbone, we compare physical context represented by ground-truth parameters, estimated parameters, and learned interaction-history representations, for both forward prediction and executed control. For prediction, ground-truth physical parameters reduce next-shape error by 15.8% over geometry alone, and estimated parameters are slightly more predictive than interaction history. This ordering does not carry over to control: estimated parameters provide no detectable one-step control gain, whereas history-conditioned GPF reduces executed error by 9.9% relative to geometry-only GPF across 470 paired simulation trials. In closed loop, interaction history improves strict-threshold attainment in simulation and yields the strongest zero-shot performance on hardware. All policies are trained exclusively in simulation and transferred to the physical robot without real-world training or fine-tuning. These results show that physical context should be evaluated by the decisions it supports rather than by predictive accuracy alone. Code will be released upon acceptance.

Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) is widely used to align large language models with human preferences, but it remains vulnerable to \emph{reward hacking}, whereby a policy exploits flaws in the reward function at the expense of the intended behavior. Reward shaping can stabilize training and partially mitigate reward hacking, yet its design principles remain underexplored. Our systematic study of common shaping methods suggests that shaped rewards should be bounded and should rise rapidly before gradually saturating. We introduce \emph{Preference as Reward} (PAR), which applies a sigmoid to centered rewards to produce a signal that reflects the reward model's latent preferences. We show that PAR has a variance-reduction property that stabilizes training and substantially widens the window for effective early stopping. Using Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) and Gemma2-2B, PAR consistently outperforms the other shaping methods evaluated and demonstrates high data efficiency and robustness. Comparisons with unshaped rewards across four base models and four reinforcement learning algorithms show that PAR is effective across models and particularly beneficial for actor--critic methods when value estimates become unstable. The code is available at https://github.com/PorUna-byte/PAR.

World-Action Models improve robot control by predicting future visual dynamics, but iterative video denoising incurs substantial inference overhead. Recent approaches reduce this cost through partial future denoising, yet typically rely on fixed refinement budgets. Our empirical observations reveal that preferred refinement depths vary across tasks and states, while different future regions exhibit varying relevance to action generation. Motivated by these findings, we propose Elastic-WAM, which adaptively allocates world refinement computation across temporal denoising time and spatial future space. A unified spatiotemporal refinement demand field governs when to stop world refinement, how far to advance each denoising step, and which regions to refresh. We parameterize this field with a shared temporal basis and spatial amplitudes, and learn it through a three-stage action-grounded supervised procedure. At inference, the learned field guides recurrent sparse world refinement to improve task success while reducing inference overhead. Evaluations across diverse simulation benchmarks and real-world long-horizon manipulation demonstrate state-of-the-art control performance with reduced inference latency.

An attributed hypergraph comprises nodes with attributes and hyperedges that connect varying numbers of nodes. Attributed hypergraph node and hyperedge embedding (AHNEE) maps nodes and hyperedges to compact vectors for use in important tasks such as node classification, hyperedge link prediction, and hyperedge classification. Generating high-quality embeddings is challenging due to the complexity of attributed hypergraphs and the need to embed both nodes and hyperedges, especially in large-scale data. Existing solutions often fall short by focusing only on nodes or lacking native support for attributed hypergraphs, leading to inferior quality, and struggle with scalability on large attributed hypergraphs. We propose SAHE, an efficient and effective approach that unifies node and hyperedge embeddings for AHNEE computation, advancing the state of the art via comprehensive embedding formulations and algorithmic designs. First, we introduce two higher-order similarity measures, HMS-N and HMS-E, to capture similarities between node pairs and hyperedge pairs, respectively. These measures consider multi-hop connections and global topology within an extended hypergraph that incorporates attribute-based hyperedges. SAHE formulates the AHNEE objective to jointly preserve all-pair HMS-N and HMS-N similarities. Direct optimization is computationally expensive, so we analyze and unify core approximations of all-pair HMS-N and HMS-N to solve them simultaneously. To enhance efficiency, we design several non-trivial optimizations that avoid iteratively materializing large dense matrices while maintaining high-quality results. Extensive experiments on diverse attributed hypergraphs and 3 downstream tasks, compared against 11 baselines, show that SAHE consistently outperforms existing methods in embedding quality and is up to orders of magnitude faster.