让下一篇重要论文，不再错过。

Beyond Noise: Characterizing Creative Potential in Unverifiable LLM Hallucinations

Yu Yan, Chunhong Zhang, Haiyu Zhao, Ziyang Zeng, Zihao Liu, Yongkang Wu, Jianzhou Diao Beijing University of Post and Telecommunications, YiJie Chen 等 10 位作者

In knowledge-intensive creative tasks, Large Language Models (LLMs) often generate outputs that extend beyond established knowledge, making direct verification against current evidence impractical. Unlike factual hallucinations checked against ground truth, such outputs arise naturally in creative generation, where extending beyond current knowledge is often the goal. Yet prior work debates whether hallucination should be suppressed or embraced without empirically analyzing this unverifiable subclass. On the ideation evaluation side, existing work focuses on individual outputs without characterizing the unverifiable space as a whole. To address this gap, we propose a novelty-verifiability characterization that distinguishes Creative Synthesis (Region A) from Groundless Fabrication (Region B), and study it through a conceptual creation task where LLMs synthesize novel scientific concepts. Through 32,400 generations across three technical domains and 1,080 human judgments, we find that Region A is non-negligible (4.7%) and robust, persisting across generation strategies, models, domains, and embedding choices. A retrospective recovery experiment further shows that LLMs can approximate post-cutoff scientific concepts in controlled combinatorial settings. Our findings suggest that the unverifiable space is not uniformly noise but exhibits empirically distinguishable internal structure, providing an empirical basis for more selective hallucination governance.[https://github.com/YuLab1/llm-concept-creation]

尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要

Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表

GLARE: Agentic Reasoning for Legal Judgment Prediction

Xinyu Yang, Chenlong Deng Renmin University of China, Zhicheng Dou Renmin University of China

Legal judgment prediction serves as a pivotal task in intelligent judicial systems. Although large language models have achieved remarkable progress in general reasoning, they struggle with tasks that require fine-grained distinctions between similar charges. These models often select plausible charges directly without discriminating among closely related alternatives. In this paper, we introduce GLARE, an agentic legal reasoning framework that enables models to actively retrieve and apply external knowledge during decision-making. Unlike static prediction, GLARE simulates comparative reasoning by dynamically expanding the decision space to include confusing candidates, then retrieving exclusionary logic from precedents and statutes to identify the correct judgment. Experiments on real-world datasets show that our method significantly outperforms strong baselines, especially on complex cases involving confusing or rare charges. The code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/GLARE-LJP-8EDF.

尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要

Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表

ALDEN: Reinforcement Learning for Active Navigation and Evidence Gathering in Long Documents

Tianyu Yang Georg-August Universität Göttingen, Terry Ruas Georg-August Universität Göttingen, Yijun Tian, Jan Philip Wahle Georg-August Universität Göttingen, Daniel Kurzawe Georg-August Universität Göttingen, Bela Gipp Georg-August Universität Göttingen

While Vision–language models (VLMs) interpret text-rich images effectively, they struggle with reasoning across long, multi-page documents. We present \textbf{A}ctive \mathbf{L}ong \mathbf{D}ocum\mathbf{E}nt \mathbf{N}avigation (ALDEN), a multi-turn reinforcement learning framework that fine-tunes VLMs as interactive agents capable of actively navigating long, visually rich documents rather than passive readers. ALDEN features a novel fetch action that allows direct page indexing, complementing the classic \textbf{search} action and better exploiting document structure. To ensure training efficiency and stability, we introduce a rule-based cross-level reward for dense supervision and a visual-semantic anchoring mechanism utilizing dual-path KL-divergence constraints. We train ALDEN on a curated corpus built from open-source datasets where trivial samples are filtered, and queries are rewritten to incentivize multi-turn navigation and fetch usage. Empirically, ALDEN achieves state-of-the-art results on five long-document benchmarks, offering a more accurate and efficient path for long-document understanding.

尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要

Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表

MedVerse: Efficient and Reliable Medical Reasoning via DAG-Structured Parallel Execution

Jianwen Chen University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Xinyu Yang Carnegie Mellon University, Peng Xia Department of Computer Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Arian Azarang University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Yueh Z Lee University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Gang Li, Hongtu Zhu, Yun Li University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 等 10 位作者

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong performance and rapid progress in a wide range of medical reasoning tasks.However, their sequential autoregressive decoding forces inherently parallel clinical reasoning, such as differential diagnosis, into a single linear reasoning path, limiting both efficiency and reliability for complex medical problems.To address this, we propose MedVerse, a reasoning framework for complex medical inference that reformulates medical reasoning as a parallelizable directed acyclic graph (DAG) process based on Petri Net theory.The framework adopts a full-stack design across data, model architecture, and system execution.For data creation, we introduce the MedVerse Curator, an automated pipeline that synthesizes knowledge-grounded medical reasoning path and transforms them into Petri Net–structured representations.At the architectural level, we propose a topology-aware attention mechanism with adaptive position indices that supports parallel reasoning while preserving logical consistency.Systematically, we develop a customized inference engine that supports parallel execution without additional overhead.Empirical evaluations show that MedVerse improves strong general-purpose LLMs by up to 8.9%. Compared to specialized medical LLMs, MedVerse achieves comparable performance with improved clinical reliability, while delivering a 1.3\times reduction in inference latency and a 1.7\times increase in generation throughput, enabled by its parallel decoding capability.

尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要

Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表

When "Correct" Is Not Safe: Can We Trust Functionally Correct Patches Generated by Code Agents?

Yibo Peng, James Song, Lei Li, Xinyu Yang Carnegie Mellon University, Mihai Christodorescu Google, Ravi Mangal Colorado State University, Corina Pasareanu, Haizhong Zheng CMU, Carnegie Mellon University 等 9 位作者

Code agents are increasingly trusted to autonomously fix bugs on platforms such as GitHub, yet their security evaluation focuses almost exclusively on functional correctness. In this paper, we reveal a novel type of threat to real-world code-agents: functionally correct yet vulnerable (FCV) patches, which pass all test cases but contain vulnerable code. With our proposed FCV-Attack, we demonstrate that SOTA LLMs (e.g., ChatGPT and Claude) and agent scaffolds (e.g., SWE-agent and OpenHands) are all vulnerable to this FCV threat; across 12 agent-model combinations on SWE-Bench, the attack only requires black-box access and a single query to the code agent to perform the attack. For example, for CWE-538 (information exposure vulnerability), the FCV-Attack attains an attack success rate of 40.7% on GPT-5 Mini + OpenHands. Our results reveal an important security threat overlooked by current evaluation paradigms and urge the development of security-aware defenses for code agents.

尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要

Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表

AutoResearchClaw: Self-Reinforcing Autonomous Research with Human-AI Collaboration

Jiaqi Liu, Shi Qiu, Mairui Li, Bingzhou Li, Haonian Ji, Siwei Han, Xinyu Ye, Peng Xia 等 36 位作者

Automating scientific discovery requires more than generating papers from ideas. Real research is iterative: hypotheses are challenged from multiple perspectives, experiments fail and inform the next attempt, and lessons accumulate across cycles. Existing autonomous research systems often model this process as a linear pipeline: they rely on single-agent reasoning, stop when execution fails, and do not carry experience across runs. We present AutoResearchClaw, a multi-agent autonomous research pipeline built on five mechanisms: structured multi-agent debate for hypothesis generation and result analysis, a self-healing executor with a \textsc{Pivot}/\textsc{Refine} decision loop that transforms failures into information, verifiable result reporting that prevents fabricated numbers and hallucinated citations, human-in-the-loop collaboration with seven intervention modes spanning full autonomy to step-by-step oversight, and cross-run evolution that converts past mistakes into future safeguards. On ARC-Bench, a 25-topic experiment-stage benchmark, AutoResearchClaw outperforms AI Scientist v2 by 54.7%. A human-in-the-loop ablation across seven intervention modes reveals that precise, targeted collaboration at high-leverage decision points consistently outperforms both full autonomy and exhaustive step-by-step oversight. We position AutoResearchClaw as a research amplifier that augments rather than replaces human scientific judgment. Code is available at https://github.com/aiming-lab/AutoResearchClaw.

尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要