让下一篇重要论文，不再错过。

Current human-AI alignment and evaluation methods for large language models (LLMs) often rely on preference signals collected immediately after an interaction. This practice implicitly treats preference as static, even though many LLM-mediated decisions unfold over time and may be re-evaluated differently after real-world consequences and observed outcomes. Therefore, we argue for a methodological shift from single-moment preference elicitation to longitudinal, context-situated alignment measurement. We present a methodological framework for collecting temporally grounded alignment signals by combining (1) in-situ preference capture, (2) context-triggered follow-up preference reflection, and (3) privacy-preserving behavioral traces that help interpret preference change. As an instantiation of this methodology, we introduce BITE, a browser-based system that detects consequential LLM interactions, prompts reflection across later decision points, and supports progressive, user-controlled consent for sharing behavioral data. Through a two week longitudinal deployment study with 8 participants, our approach surfaced differences between immediate and later user preferences in accuracy, relevance and other dimensions of the LLM output. Our findings highlight the limitations of single-moment preference datasets and underscore the importance of longitudinal methods for alignment evaluation in everyday use.

Flood peak depth on normally dry land governs damage and risk to life, but is observed only sparsely, by post-event high-water mark (HWM) surveys, and depth derived from satellite flood extent is produced after the event and inherits the vertical error of the digital elevation model (DEM) it is computed from. Deep-learning flood models have in turn been trained on hydrodynamic simulations rather than on observed depths. We ask whether flood peak depth can be learned from field observations and predicted before the peak from spaceborne terrain, geospatial foundation-model embeddings and antecedent meteorological forcing. We assembled 5689 USGS HWM surveys from 39 events (2011-2025) in 24 U.S. states and Puerto Rico, assigned each a peak time from nearby sensors, paired each with a rain-free window at the same site, and linked them to Copernicus GLO-30 terrain, AlphaEarth embeddings and 144 h of hourly forcing masked to the lead time. A cross-modal fusion network trained on these observations predicts depth at the surveyed marks with a mean absolute error of 0.39 m 6 h ahead of the peak. Supervision by surveyed depth corrects the DEM error implicitly: differencing the measured peak water level with the same DEM gives 0.93 m at the same marks, 2.4 times larger, although it uses the measured water level and the model does not. Forcing accounts for 77% of the attributed reduction in depth error; terrain and the embeddings are statistically equivalent to each other and contribute the remaining 23%. On eleven held-out events the model still separates flooded from rain-free conditions but no longer resolves depth at the marks (R2 = 0.03), so the skill reported here is confined to the events and regions sampled. Field-surveyed depths can thus supervise flood depth prediction and correct terrain error that extent-based estimation cannot, while transfer to unseen storms remains the open problem.

The sparse identification of nonlinear dynamics (SINDy) recovers interpretable governing equations from time-series data by sparse regression over a library of candidate functions. As data sets, candidate libraries and the number of repeated fits grow, the cost of SINDy becomes dominated by the evaluation of the library matrix and its least-squares problems. We present an open-source Python implementation of SINDy in which a single set of loop-based kernels is just-in-time compiled with Numba and executed on a shared-memory multicore node by four interchangeable back ends: Numba prange, OpenMP directives through PyOMP, Python threads that release the global interpreter lock, and multiprocessing with shared memory. The normal equations are accumulated in one cache-blocked pass over the data, with an automatic fallback to a tall-skinny QR reduction for ill-conditioned problems. Two decompositions are studied on the Lorenz and Rössler systems: an ensemble (task-parallel) workload of 960 independent identifications and a library (data-parallel) workload of one trajectory with $2\times10^7$ samples and a fifth-order library of 56 candidate terms. All back ends recover the exact sparsity pattern in every identification, with coefficient errors identical to PySINDy. On a dual-socket Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 node of the University of Houston-Downtown HPC cluster (24 cores, 48 hardware threads), the compiled serial code is 4.3-5.6x faster than PySINDy, the parallel back ends reach speed-ups of 14.8-20.3 on 24 cores (parallel efficiency 0.61-0.84), and the overall time to solution is reduced by up to 117x with respect to PySINDy. We analyse the differences between the back ends, the effect of the two sockets and of hyper-threading, and give practical recommendations.

Sign language processing advances rapidly for high-resource languages such as American Sign Language (ASL), yet most of the world's sign languages lack the phonological annotations new methods require. We present the first zero-shot cross-lingual framework for handshape recognition, transferring from ASL to Catalan Sign Language (LSC). Our approach leverages the decomposition of handshapes into five phonological features -- selected fingers, flexion, spread, thumb position, and thumb contact -- shared across both languages, to decode LSC handshapes from predicted features via a composite phonological distance metric. We evaluate three architectures (MLP, SL-GCN, SHuBERT) trained on two ASL corpora (PopSign, Sem-Lex) against a 37-handshape, single-signer LSC benchmark. Zero-shot transfer proves viable once recording-format disparities are harmonized, reaching 80.0% phonological feature accuracy and 54.5% expected handshape accuracy. Phonological decomposition thus offers a bridge for extending sign language technologies to low-resource languages without any target-language video training labels.

Automatic Target Recognition (ATR) in Synthetic Aperture Sonar (SAS) is often underpinned by deep neural networks (DNNs). Recent research has focused on relatively low-capacity DNNs (i.e., relatively fewer trainable parameters) to avoid overfitting on the small training datasets that are typically available for SAS. However, recent research has found that increasing DNN capacity often improves performance, even when training data is scarce. Motivated by this emerging finding - termed the double descent phenomenon - this work investigates the use of especially high-capacity DNNs for SAS-ATR. We evaluate the performance of several state-of-the-art DNN architectures as we increase their model capacity. We examine performance in a realistic leave-one-geo-location-out cross-validation scheme. We find that increasing model capacity often increases performance substantially, and is never harmful. All of our large models significantly outperform two baseline models from recent publications. Training high-capacity models on small dataset however requires careful regularization, and we also perform systematic experiments showing the impact of several regularization strategies: pretraining on other imaging modalities, data augmentation (including some new to SAS), DropPath, and weight decay. We show that each of these strategies independently improves the performance of the large models.

Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) are pancreatic cancer precursors, and guideline-based risk stratification both over-treats indolent lesions and misses progression. We present Cyst-X, a public benchmark of 1,461 T1-weighted (T1W) and T2-weighted (T2W) MRI volumes from 764 patients at seven centers, with expert pancreas masks, risk labels, splits and reference AI risk-prediction models. PanSegNet segmented the pancreas with Dice of 86.34% (T1W) and 89.26% (T2W) on held-out centers. For the primary task, high-risk versus low-risk IPMN, a 3D DenseNet-121 achieved cross-validated AUCs of 74.59% and 73.45%; complementary broad binary and three-class tasks reached 78.67--81.28% and 73.47--75.76%. Because patient images often cannot be pooled across institutions, we also simulated federated learning across the seven centers. On T2W MRI, FedProx was similar to centralized training in center-averaged external AUC (71.00% versus 71.18%) but not in pooled AUC (62.35% versus 77.49%). Radiologist comparisons showed cohort-dependent sensitivity--specificity tradeoffs. Cyst-X supports reproducible method development and identifies within-IPMN risk discrimination and cross-center score comparability as open challenges.

Many Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) agents fail to adapt properly to cooperating with agents trained with the same objectives but different seeds, algorithms, or other training differences. This is the problem of Zero-Shot Coordination (ZSC), which focuses on training agents to cooperate well with unknown agents. ZSC has been studied for a variety of tabular cases and simple games such as Hanabi, achieving excellent results. However, existing solutions to ZSC only consider identical rewards for your trained agents and all future partners. This is not realistic for the trained agents, as they do not consider the problem of cooperating with agents that have identical sparse objectives but shape the rewards for those objectives in different manner. To address this issue, we show how to train an ensemble of methods using randomized reward shapings chosen using 4 selection algorithms. Experiments done on the Overcooked environment demonstrate consistent improvements of 62.2%-119.2% in sparse reward over baseline ZSC algorithms when playing with agents that have identical sparse rewards but different reward shapings.