跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+1已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-07 19:34 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-07 17:43各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-06 19:39 — 2026-11-07 19:39(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-07 19:34最近发现新增版本:2026-11-07 17:43库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-06 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

17,100 已收录论文14,661 AI 相关4,056 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-07 19:30(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.08397

一种近乎最优的广义排序算法

A Near-Optimal Generalized Sorting Algorithm

Sanjeev Khanna, Aaron Putterman, Junkai Song

AI 速读 基于摘要

作者提出一种随机算法,在期望 O(n log^4 n) 次比较内解决广义排序问题,说明该问题在忽略对数因子后并不比普通排序更难。

cs.DS

查看原文摘要

We continue the study of the classic \emph{generalized sorting problem}, a basic variant of ordinary sorting. There are $n$ elements and an (initially hidden) total ordering $π$ over them. Unlike in ordinary sorting, however, only \emph{some} comparisons are allowed: those given by the edges of an undirected graph $G = (V, E)$ on the elements. How many comparisons are needed to find the total ordering? In ordinary sorting, $Θ(n \log n)$ comparisons are necessary and sufficient. For generalized sorting, however, the best known upper bound has been $\tilde{O}(n^{3/2})$ since the work of Huang, Kannan, and Khanna (FOCS 2011), who even asked whether the problem might in fact require $n^{1+Ω(1)}$ comparisons. We show that it does not: we give a randomized algorithm that uses $O(n \log^4 n)$ comparisons in expectation. Thus, up to logarithmic factors, generalized sorting is no harder than ordinary sorting.

新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.06626

Deterministic Connectivity Sketches Under Edge Deletions

Sanjeev Khanna, Aaron Putterman, Madhu Sudan

原文摘要

How much information about a graph is needed to determine its connectivity after arbitrary valid edge deletions? This question is at the heart of designing deterministic dynamic streaming algorithms for graph connectivity. Towards answering this question, we study the deterministic one-way communication problem in which Alice holds a graph $G_A = (V, E_A)$ on $n$ vertices, Bob holds a graph $G_B = (V, E_B)$ with $E_B \subseteq E_A$, and Alice sends a message $M \in \{0,1\}^m$ that allows Bob to decide whether $G_A - G_B$ is connected. Randomized sketches solve this problem using $\tilde O(n)$ bits, whereas deterministic recovery of even one surviving edge requires $Ω(n^2)$ bits. We prove an upper bound of $m = \widetilde{O}(n^{7/4})$ bits and a lower bound of $m = \widetildeΩ(n^{3/2})$ bits for deciding connectivity. Thus, connectivity admits a subquadratic deterministic representation despite the quadratic cost of edge recovery, but remains polynomially harder than its randomized counterpart. The upper bound immediately yields an $\widetilde{O}(n^{7/4})$-bit deterministic $n^2$-fault tolerant connectivity oracle, which reports the connected components of a graph $G$ after any valid set of edge deletions. We also obtain an $\tilde Ω(n f^{1/4})$-bit lower bound for deterministic $f$-fault tolerant connectivity oracles for every $f \in [1,n^2]$. Finally, we show that the separation between connectivity and edge recovery persists in deterministic single-pass dynamic streams with bounded update multiplicity. For every fixed $ε\in (0,1/3)$, our algorithm reports the connected components of the final simple graph using $\widetilde{O}(n^{15/8 + 3ε/8})$ bits (subquadratic space), provided each edge undergoes at most $n^ε$ insertion or deletion updates in total.

cs.DS