跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文，不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科，以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词，把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+1072新增论文
+845其中 AI 相关
+94已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描：2026-11-09 16:31 · 全站最近入库：2026-11-09 13:22各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-08 16:34 — 2026-11-09 16:34（北京时间） · 点击数字查看对应简报；AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查：2026-11-09 16:31最近发现新增版本：2026-11-09 13:22库内论文最新更新时间：2026-11-07 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常；新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

18,172 已收录论文15,506 AI 相关4,527 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

研究日报 / 周报 →按信源浏览 →

时间范围跟随排序：版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常，查看状态 →

找到 4 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-09 16:29（北京时间）
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.01493

TopoSteer: Topological Layer Selection for Activation Steering in LLMs

Tuc Nguyen, Marcos Gutiérrez-del-Pozo, Eduardo Paluzo-Hidalgo, Yifan Hu, Adaku Uchendu, Thai Le

原文摘要

Activation steering controls large language models at inference time by adding a vector to their internal representations. Most work asks how to build that vector, and far less attention has gone to where to add it, even though steering at a poorly chosen layer can be worse than not steering at all. Prior selectors choose a layer without ever steering the model to test it: they score how separable the target behavior is at that layer, and how consistently the individual examples point along the steering direction. We argue that what matters is not the separability of the two activation clouds, nor the alignment of individual displacements with their mean, but the extent of the cloud of per-example displacements that mean-difference steering averages. We propose a topology-based layer selection method, called TopoSteer, which scores a layer by the total H_0 persistence of its displacement cloud, computed as the length of the cloud's Euclidean minimum spanning tree. We show that the score focuses on the displacement cloud's relative geometry, while class separation affects it only through standardization. We also provide a theoretical explanation for our method by proving that, as example-level variation increases, TopoSteer and discriminability move in opposite directions, so the two criteria can rank layers in opposite ways. Across multiple language models and steering tasks, TopoSteer provides a principled alternative to discriminability- and separability-based layer selection and yields more effective steering without requiring held-out validation.

cs.CL · cs.LG

查看论文
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
首次观测 · 记录 #1ACL Anthology · ACL 2026:acl:2026.acl-industry.9ACL Anthology · ACL 2026

Synthetic Text Detection in the Age of Large Language Models: Watermark vs. Automatic Detection

Adaku Uchendu

原文摘要

Given the ubiquitous nature of Large Language Models (LLMs) and its impressive capabilities, malicious uses of this technology to generate harmful content have been observed. Thus, to mitigate this serious security risk LLMs pose, many researchers have proposed two techniques for detecting synthetic texts generated from LLMs - watermark and automatic detection. The idea with watermarking LLMs involves infusing generated content with algorithmically-identifiable patterns during generation. This makes accurate synthetic text detection achievable with watermark detection. While, for automatic detection, the focus is on using statistical and linguistic cues to reveal authorship of texts as human or LLM. Currently, both types of synthetic text detectors achieve state-of-the-art performance, however, the better detector is still unknown. To ascertain the better detection method, we evaluate each method on their performance on both unperturbed and perturbed (i.e., adversarially manipulated texts) data. We perform a comprehensive study across six different sizes of Qwen2.5 models, six watermark techniques and detectors, two automatic detectors, three authorship obfuscation methods for different levels of syntactic changes, and two datasets of different text lengths. Our results suggest that there is no detector that consistently outperforms on all scenarios. However, we observe that the (1) automatic detectors are better for short synthetic text detection; and (2) watermark detectors perform better defending against the word-level attack implemented.

cs.CL

Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 6: Industry Track) · 2026 · 正式发表

首次观测 · 记录 #1ACL Anthology · ACL 2026:acl:2026.acl-long.144ACL Anthology · ACL 2026

DIA-HARM: Dialectal Disparities in Harmful Content Detection Across 50 English Dialects

Jason S Lucas, Matt Murtagh White, Ali Al-Lawati, Uchendu Uchendu Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Adaku Uchendu MIT Lincoln Laboratory, Dongwon Lee The Pennsylvania State University

原文摘要

Harmful content detectors—particularly disinformation classifiers—are predominantly developed and evaluated on Standard American English (), leaving their robustness to dialectal variation unexplored. We present , the first benchmark for evaluating disinformation detection robustness across 50 English dialects spanning U.S., British, African, Caribbean, and Asia-Pacific varieties. Using Multi-VALUE’s linguistically-grounded transformations, we introduce D-CUBE (Dialectal Disinformation Detection Corpus), a core corpus component of comprising 195K samples derived from established disinformation benchmarks. Our evaluation of 16 detection models reveals systematic vulnerabilities: human-written dialectal content degrades detection by 1.4–3.6% F1, while AI-generated content remains stable. Fine-tuned transformers substantially outperform zero-shot LLMs (96.6% vs. 78.3% best-case F1), with some models exhibiting catastrophic failures exceeding 33% degradation on mixed content. Cross-dialectal transfer analysis across 2,450 dialect pairs shows that multilingual models (mDeBERTa: 97.2% average F1) generalize effectively, while monolingual models like RoBERTa and XLM-RoBERTa fail on dialectal inputs. These findings demonstrate that current disinformation detectors may systematically disadvantage hundreds of millions of non- speakers worldwide. We release the benchmark, including the , and evaluation tools.

cs.CL

Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表

首次观测 · 记录 #1ACL Anthology · ACL 2026:acl:2026.acl-srw.24ACL Anthology · ACL 2026

The Shape of Vulnerability: How Adversarial Perturbations Reshape the Topology of Language Model Latent Spaces

Angelina Tsai, Shreya Subramanian, Catherine Liu, Kimberly Lopez, Leif Zinn-Brooks, Alexia E. Schulz, Adaku Uchendu MIT Lincoln Laboratory

原文摘要

Adversarial perturbations in the context of large language models (LLMs) are subtle changes added to input data (i.e., images or text) that are designed to alter predictions or outputs of machine learning models. We introduce several novel visualizations using topological data analysis (TDA) (leveraging persistent homology) to characterize how adversarial perturbations act on text inputs, specifically, how sandbagging and code-injection attacksalter the geometric structure of attention heads in transformer models. By computing persistent homology metrics from attention maps across different model architectures (such as BERT, RoBERTa, ELECTRA, DistilGPT, etc.), we find that adversarial inputs alter higher-dimensional topological features (H_{1} loops and H_{2} voids) in ways that distinguish them from clean, non-adversarial inputs.

cs.CL

Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 4: Student Research Workshop) · 2026 · 正式发表