跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

论文库

检索计算机领域论文,按研究方向、作者或关键词筛选。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+2已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-15 04:40 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-14 05:37 — 2026-11-15 05:37(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-15 04:40最近发现新增版本:2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-15 04:38(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.16726

From Data to Wisdom: Rethinking AI Through an Epistemic Lens

Afonso Eduardo

原文摘要

This paper proposes the Data-to-Wisdom Epistemic Architecture for AI (EAAI), a conceptual framework treating Data, Information, Knowledge, Understanding and Wisdom as five distinct but recursively interacting epistemic functions: observation, contextual interpretation, modeling and prediction, critical evaluation and informed judgment. Two observations motivate it: sequential readings of the Knowledge Pyramid obscure how these functions interact, and a targeted review of ten Bayesian reference books finds that prior distributions are defined mathematically while "prior information" and "prior knowledge" are not consistently distinguished as epistemic categories. A Bayesian interpretation relates the likelihood, prior and posterior distributions, posterior prediction, model checking and decision analysis to the five functions, without limiting EAAI to Bayesian systems. Extending "prior" in an epistemic sense, the paper distinguishes five kinds of prior context that can shape the model, the likelihood, the prior, evaluation and action. Three worked applications -- quantitative financial risk, actuarial modeling in health insurance and agentic AI for medical reimbursement claims -- show how EAAI structures the analysis of model assumptions, evidence interpretation, validation, dependencies and decision consequences, separating the prediction of a risk, the appraisal of its reliability and the justification of action. It draws implications for AI and machine learning, including evaluation by function, treating intermediate model outputs as evidence open to challenge and separating generation from appraisal, and compares EAAI with work on DIKW, Bayesian workflow, AI evaluation and risk governance. Its contributions are an epistemic vocabulary with recursive relationships, a more accessible reading of Bayesian methodology, a typology of prior context and clearer methodological terminology.

cs.LG · cs.AI