跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+1030新增论文
+790其中 AI 相关
+127已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-11 18:22 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-11 18:36各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-10 18:38 — 2026-11-11 18:38(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-11 18:22最近发现新增版本:2026-11-11 18:36库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-11 08:00

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

21,673 已收录论文18,321 AI 相关6,055 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-11 18:20(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.12016

Speculative Self-Distillation enables Efficient Knowledge Internalization

Shayan Talaei, Agam Bhatia, Arshia Soltani Moakhar, Jonas Hübotter, Amin Saberi, Azalia Mirhoseini

原文摘要

Many real-world applications require language models to internalize knowledge that was absent from pretraining, to incorporate continually updated facts, or to learn new domain skills. Self-distillation has emerged as a natural approach for this task. A model conditioned on the source material acts as the teacher, and an unconditioned student is trained to reproduce the teacher's behavior closed-book. We propose Speculative Self-Distillation (SSD), an efficient per-token mixed-policy method for self-distillation. The student generates each rollout by default, while the teacher intervenes only at positions where its next-token distribution substantially diverges from the student's. Unlike off-policy distillation with teacher-generated prefixes, this design keeps training rollouts close to the student's test-time behavior, while avoiding the low-signal states that fully on-policy rollouts drift into. In effect, SSD lets the teacher steer the rollout exactly where the privileged context changes the prediction. On three closed-book QA benchmarks measuring fact recall, knowledge updates, and skill acquisition, SSD nearly matches on-policy distillation while using 38-69% fewer supervised tokens and consistently outperforms off-policy distillation on the held-out test set. On a forgetting stress test, SSD retains the most general capability while also achieving the best in-domain accuracy and using less supervision than the on-policy baseline. Overall, SSD establishes a new accuracy-efficiency-forgetting Pareto frontier for self-distillation.

cs.LG · cs.AI · cs.CL

版本更新 · v4arXiv:2606.00995

Subliminal Learning Is Steering Vector Distillation

Camila Blank, Agam Bhatia, Senthooran Rajamanoharan, Arthur Conmy, Neel Nanda

原文摘要

Subliminal learning refers to a student language model acquiring a teacher's traits (e.g. a system-prompted preference for owls) when fine-tuned on the teacher's outputs, despite the outputs being semantically unrelated to those traits. It remains poorly understood how data without semantic meaning can transfer specific semantic traits. In this work, we show that subliminal learning is mediated by a single steering vector, i.e. a vector added to the model's activations. Across two open-source models, we find that the teacher's system prompt is well approximated by a steering vector, and that the student's behavior is driven by learning an aligned vector over fine-tuning. System prompts that are not well approximated by steering vectors are not subliminally learned. This is a special case of steering vector distillation, in which a student trained on the outputs of a steered teacher learns to imitate that steering. We demonstrate steering vector distillation on a range of semantic and random vectors. Adding a semantic vector to a model's activations can have both model-independent and model-specific (i.e. non-semantic) effects on its behavior, so generated data that is non-semantic can transmit a vector with semantic effects, enabling subliminal learning. This also explains why subliminal learning does not transfer between models. We find that adaptive optimizers are necessary for subliminal learning in language models: activation gradients on steered data carry a small but consistent component along the steering direction, and non-adaptive optimizers impede this by allowing outlier gradients to dominate.

cs.AI