跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+0已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-09 06:10 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-08 06:02各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-08 06:45 — 2026-11-09 06:45(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-09 06:10最近发现新增版本:2026-11-08 06:02库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-06 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

17,100 已收录论文14,661 AI 相关4,057 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-09 06:08(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.05106

Label-Preserving Fourier Domain Adaptation with Generative-AI and Real Style Donors for 3D Mitral Valve Segmentation

Javeria Javed, Ahmed Salim, Muhammad Mahboob Ur Rahman

原文摘要

Accurate segmentation of the mitral valve from three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (3D TEE) is severely restricted by the scarcity of publicly available expert- annotated volumetric datasets. To address this critical limitation, we investigated Fourier Domain Adaptation (FDA), utilizing general-purpose generative-AI images (from platforms like Chat- GPT, Google Gemini, and Microsoft MAI) as annotation-free style donors for 3D mitral valve segmentation. We employed a DeepMitral residual U-Net model on the public MVSeg2023 dataset, comparing six conditions over three runs: real-only training, traditional augmentation, FDA with each generative source, and a non-AI FDA control using real-image style donors, plus an optimization-matched real-only control and a \b{eta} sensitivity analysis. Case-level paired testing showed that FDA with these generative sources led to significant reductions in boundary- and surface-related errors across all three donor conditions relative to the primary real-only baseline. However, the impact on the core segmentation metric, Generalized Dice Score (GDS), proved generator-dependent. ChatGPT-FDA showed a significant GDS advantage over the optimization-matched control but not over the primary baseline, and Gemini-FDA showed no significant GDS difference. Notably, only MAI-FDA provided a statistically robust and significant increase in GDS compared to the primary baseline. The \b{eta} sensitivity was not robust across training runs. These findings confirm that FDA remains an important augmentation mechanism. While generative-AI images offer a practical means of acquiring style diversity without new annotations, the non-AI control performed comparably to ChatGPT-FDA, so we do not conclude that this approach is superior to training with real-image donors.

eess.IV · cs.CV