跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+2471新增论文
+2025其中 AI 相关
+163已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-11 03:54 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-10 15:22各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-10 04:17 — 2026-11-11 04:17(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-11 03:54最近发现新增版本:2026-11-10 15:22库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-10 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

20,643 已收录论文17,531 AI 相关5,643 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-11 03:53(北京时间)
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2610.19732

Controlling the latency in temporal coded spiking models for neuromorphic datasets

Alban Gattepaille, Alexandre Muzy

原文摘要

Spiking neural networks (SNNs) promise energy-efficient, event-driven computation on neuromorphic hardware, where response time, or latency, matters as much as energy for real-time applications. Time-to-first-spike (TTFS) coding with learnable synaptic delays is a natural way to exploit the timing of events. However, in state-of-the-art spiking neuron models, spike times emerge from nonlinear membrane dynamics and thresholds: no closed-form expression links network parameters to spike times, so latency can only be measured empirically, not specified or guaranteed at design time. Moreover, TTFS models are mostly evaluated on static datasets, which hides their latency on truly temporal data. Our hypothesis is that, if spike times are computed directly as closed-form functions of presynaptic spike times and synaptic delays, bypassing membrane potential and thresholding, latency becomes an explicit function of the learnable parameters that can be bounded, and therefore controlled, analytically. We build on this hypothesis with the Delay Neural Network (DeNN) in real time, which turns event streams into successive single-spike images, computes each spike time from standardised inter-spike intervals and synaptic delays, and links successive images through a long-term memory. We prove lower and upper bounds on the latency of every neuron of a layer, and show that bounding the synaptic parameters after training with a single hyperparameter places the latency anywhere between these bounds, without retraining. On a ten-class subset of the Google Speech Commands dataset, this post-training control exposes the accuracy--latency trade-off: a three-hidden-layer network reaches 94.25\% accuracy while deciding, on average, 477~ms after the end of the one-second input, and about 250~ms with confidence-based early decisions. Learning is also shown to concentrate the long-term memory on a few neurons. Latency thus becomes a design parameter of spiking models rather than a quantity measured after the fact, a step towards neuromorphic systems with real-time guarantees.

cs.NE