跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+4069新增论文
+3686其中 AI 相关
+88已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-05 23:43 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-05 12:13各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-04 23:59 — 2026-11-05 23:59(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-05 23:43最近发现新增版本:2026-11-05 12:13库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-05 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

15,949 已收录论文13,765 AI 相关3,571 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-05 23:41(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2610.39100

Generating Critic-Guided Synthetic Experience in Latent World Models

Jorge de Freitas, Christos Ziakas, Alessandra Russo

Learning from offline datasets is limited in scalability, as collecting new experience is often costly or unsafe in the real world. World models offer an alternative way to generate new experience through a learned dynamics model, yet learning policies in latent space is limited due to compounding errors in imagined rollouts. To this end, we propose using the world model as a local transition generator, leveraging critic guidance to choose actions inside that model to generate synthetic experiences. We study action refinement methodologies, introducing Critic-Guided Synthetic Experience (CGSE) generation in world models. Specifically, CGSE augments an existing offline dataset by sampling candidate actions using an offline policy and refining each to maximize a first-order approximation of the $Q$-function within a trust region. We then use a frozen latent world model to imagine the future state given each updated action, and use the critic to choose the best one, appending this synthetic transition to the replay buffer. Our method requires no additional real-environment interaction or test-time planner, as it generates synthetic experience offline using the world model. On three OGBench manipulation tasks, CGSE improves an offline policy by a relative improvement of $7.1\%$ on the average success rate.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.LG · cs.AI
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
首次观测 · 记录 #1ACL Anthology · ACL 2026:acl:2026.acl-long.2156ACL Anthology · ACL 2026

Red-Bandit: Test-Time Adaptation for LLM Red-Teaming via Bandit-Guided LoRA Experts

Christos Ziakas Imperial College London, Nicholas Loo, Nishita Jain, Alessandra Russo Imperial College London

Automated red-teaming has emerged as a scalable approach for auditing Large Language Models (LLMs) prior to deployment, yet existing approaches lack mechanisms to efficiently adapt to model-specific vulnerabilities at inference. We introduce Red-Bandit, a red-teaming framework that adapts online to identify and exploit model failure modes under distinct attack styles (e.g., manipulation, slang). Red-Bandit post-trains a set of parameter-efficient LoRA experts, each specialized for a particular attack style, using reinforcement learning that rewards the generation of unsafe prompts via a rule-based safety model. At inference, a multi-armed bandit policy dynamically selects among these attack-style experts based on the target model’s response safety, balancing exploration and exploitation. Red-Bandit outperforms state-of-the-art methods on AdvBench and HarmBench, achieving higher attack success rates under sufficient exploration budgets (ASR@10), while generating more human-readable adversarial prompts (lower perplexity). In addition, Red-Bandit’s bandit policy serves as a diagnostic tool for identifying model-specific vulnerabilities by indicating which attack styles most effectively elicit harmful behaviors.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.CL

Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表

ACL Anthology · ACL 2026 ↗PDF ↗