跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+2已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-08 16:36 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-08 06:02各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-07 17:31 — 2026-11-08 17:31(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-08 16:36最近发现新增版本:2026-11-08 06:02库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-06 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

17,100 已收录论文14,661 AI 相关4,057 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-08 16:33(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.07905

Tight Worst-Case Completion-Time Bounds for Dominant Resource Fairness

Mugen Blue, Sungjin Im, Alexander Lindermayr

原文摘要

Dominant Resource Fairness (DRF) is an influential policy for sharing multiple resources among jobs with heterogeneous demands. It combines sharing incentive, strategy-proofness, envy-freeness, and Pareto efficiency, making it particularly attractive for shared computing systems. DRF has been implemented in major resource-management frameworks, including Apache Mesos and Hadoop YARN. DRF is also nonclairvoyant: it requires no advance knowledge of job sizes, making it practical when processing requirements are difficult to predict. This motivates understanding its completion-time performance relative to an optimal schedule that knows all job sizes. However, elementary arguments can only give an $Ω(\sqrt D)$ lower bound and an $O(D)$ upper bound for total completion time, where $D$ is the number of resource types. In this paper, we close this gap by proving that DRF is $Θ(\sqrt D)$-competitive. More generally, for every fixed real $q\geq1$, we show that DRF is $Θ(D^{1/(q+1)})$-competitive for the $\ell_q$ norm of completion times, with larger $q$ placing greater emphasis on late-finishing jobs. These bounds hold with arbitrary release times. We also give a refined analysis of total completion time for small $D$.

cs.DS

版本更新 · v2arXiv:2610.32545

Single-Machine Guarantees on Unrelated Machines and Beyond: Proportional Fairness for Nonclairvoyant Polytope Scheduling

Sven Jäger, Alexander Lindermayr, Bart Zondervan

原文摘要

The Polytope Scheduling Problem (PSP) is a general framework for preemptive scheduling in which feasible instantaneous job allocations form a packing polytope. In the nonclairvoyant online setting, Proportional Fairness (PF), a practical allocation rule rooted in market theory, is the leading general-purpose algorithm. On a single machine, PF coincides with weighted Round-Robin, which is $2$-competitive for weighted completion time with uniform release dates (optimal for nonclairvoyant algorithms) and $(2+\varepsilon)$-speed $O(1/\varepsilon)$-competitive for weighted flow time. Known guarantees beyond a single machine are weaker. This raises a central question: Are these heterogeneous environments intrinsically harder than a single machine under nonclairvoyance? We show that they are not: PF retains both single-machine guarantees on the novel class of support-submodular polytopes, which includes unrelated machines and polymatroids. On unrelated machines, this refutes a belief (JACM'18, SODA'25) that PF is not $O(1)$-speed $O(1)$-competitive for weighted flow time. Our main technical contribution is an equivalent characterization: a polytope is support submodular if and only if, for all job weights, the optimal weighted completion time is concave in the processing requirements. This structural insight underlies both guarantees. For general PSP, the picture changes: we give the first lower bound above $2$, showing that every randomized nonclairvoyant algorithm has a competitive ratio of at least $2+10^{-5}$ for weighted completion time, even with uniform release dates. On the positive side, we substantially improve the best known guarantee for weighted completion time from $27$ (SICOMP'26) to $4$ via a new dual-fitting analysis of PF. For weighted flow time, we show that PF achieves the first $O(1)$-speed $O(1)$-competitive nonclairvoyant guarantee for graph scheduling.

cs.DS