让下一篇重要论文，不再错过。

原文摘要

Scientific computing is under increasing pressure to adapt to HPC hardware that is shaped by AI workloads. In these modern ecosystems, extracting reasonable performance without investing major engineering effort is a central issue for domain scientists. Correctness constraints and intricate reference implementations represent further impediments to development. Instead of using a double-precision implementation as a reference, considering the underlying scientific problem directly opens more opportunities for performance improvements when updating and rewriting applications. We take seven different portability frameworks---covering pragma-based, DSL, and data-centric approaches---and evaluate them on a microphysics kernel of the ICON climate model. Our performance benchmarks show that each different HPC system benefits from a different combination of optimizations, so we develop the measure of framework expressivity to gauge how easily each framework can customize portable implementations in this way.