跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+1087新增论文
+804其中 AI 相关
+107已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-14 11:06 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-13 20:44各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-13 11:32 — 2026-11-14 11:32(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-14 11:06最近发现新增版本:2026-11-13 20:44库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,727 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-14 11:04(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.15610

Contrastive Bootstrap Representation Learning for Label-Efficient Agricultural Image Classification

Hazem Ahmed, Ali Hamdi, Ammar Mohammed

原文摘要

Expert annotation remains a major bottleneck in agricultural image classification, where collecting images is often easier than obtaining reliable labels from domain specialists. Self-supervised learning can reduce this dependence by pretraining transferable representations on unlabelled imagery. Contrastive and bootstrap methods provide two established but distinct training signals, motivating an empirical study of a formulation that applies both signals within one representation path under severe downstream label scarcity. We present Contrastive Bootstrap Representation Learning (CBRL), which jointly optimises SimCLR-style NT-Xent contrastive learning and bidirectional BYOL-style exponential-moving-average target prediction within a shared online projection space. Using a ViT-L/16 backbone and 10% of the downstream labels, we report single-seed point estimates on four primary agricultural test benchmarks plus an exploratory 33-image New Plant Diseases evaluation. CBRL records the highest macro-F1 point estimate on the four primary benchmarks. On DeepWeeds, its 79.77% test macro-F1 is 32.29 points above the random-initialisation, label-only baseline and 15.78 points above the next-highest comparison point estimate; on PlantVillage, its 98.14% macro-F1 is 10.43 and 0.43 points higher, respectively. On PlantDoc, however, all methods fail to reach practically useful performance. These results identify the evaluated joint formulation as a promising candidate for label-limited transfer, but they do not establish objective synergy, statistical superiority, or robustness across stochastic runs.

cs.CV · cs.AI · cs.LG