跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+1已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-09 05:07 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-08 06:02各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-08 05:58 — 2026-11-09 05:58(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-09 05:07最近发现新增版本:2026-11-08 06:02库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-06 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

17,100 已收录论文14,661 AI 相关4,057 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-09 05:05(北京时间)
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2610.14070

What Does the Effective Dimension of a Hybrid Quantum Neural Network Actually Measure?

Md Masum Mia, Amith Khandakar, Mohamed Arselene Ayari

原文摘要

Hybrid quantum neural networks (QNNs) pass features from a classical backbone into a variational quantum circuit, and many studies log a scalar called the effective dimension as a sign of capacity or model quality. The effective dimension is usually defined as the participation ratio (PR) of the quantum Fisher information matrix (QFIM), but studies in practice log a PR of cheap parameter sensitivities instead, and the meaning of that scalar is rarely tested. We show that the logged scalar equals the PR of Pauli-Z output sensitivities, that each sensitivity is at most n times its QFIM diagonal entry on n qubits, and that a PR of the QFIM diagonal overstates the full-matrix PR by an exact factor set by the off-diagonal mass. We then test the scalar on CIFAR-10 and EuroSAT with four frozen backbones, one of them a random projection, over 4 to 16 qubits, 1 to 4 layers, three entangling patterns, and three seeds. At a fixed circuit, CIFAR-10 accuracy spans 23.14% to 86.44% while the scalar stays between 6.63 and 9.13, and its correlation with accuracy changes sign across seeds in 7 of the 14 configurations. Depth raises the share of active parameters from 0.39 to 0.91, near a ceiling we derive, and initial gradient variance falls by a factor of 34.5 from 4 to 16 qubits. Removing entanglement raises accuracy by 5.3 to 8.2 points at the same parameter count. The effective dimension therefore describes circuit geometry rather than model quality, so capacity, trainability, and accuracy each need their own diagnostic.

quant-ph · cs.AI