跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

采集已暂停
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+0已有论文修订
+0新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:等待完成 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-02 00:39各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-03 19:42 — 2026-11-04 19:42(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:尚未完成最近发现新增版本:2026-11-02 00:39库内论文最新更新时间:2026-10-30 01:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

8,677 已收录论文7,675 AI 相关1,866 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序等待首次采集
新论文 · v1arXiv:2610.36561

Governed Sovereign RAG for Public Administration: Tripartite Epistemic Routing, Facet-Guided Clarification, and Deterministic Numeric Verification in Citizen Services

Andres Cruz Degante

Deploying conversational assistants at government service desks faces a tension between regulatory certainty (zero tolerance for invented fees), data sovereignty prohibiting commercial clouds, and high rates of underspecified or out-of-jurisdiction citizen queries. We present and evaluate a governed, sovereign Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) architecture deployed on the official portal of the State of Tlaxcala, Mexico (tlaxcaladigital.gob.mx), covering 1,143 procedures and a decoupled directory of 924 offices. The system governs interactions via three pillars: (1) a two-stage tripartite epistemic gate (clarify_policy and a Boltzmann distribution over AnyJev) arbitrating among answering (SPECIFIC), facet-guided clarification (CLARIFY), and abstaining (ABSTAIN); (2) a post-generation deterministic numeric verifier (verify_numeric_guardrail) with SHA-256 cache invalidation ensuring every generated fee or validity figure belongs to the retrieved official record; and (3) an empirical evaluation across 380 organic production traces (8 weeks) and a 200-query stratified benchmark (5-fold CV: 86.41% +/- 7.50%). In production, 89.47% of traffic is resolved at Level 0 via deterministic templates without free generation (global p50 = 0.665 s; direct L0 p50 = 0.445 s; slow-tail p95 = 30.412 s under CPU queuing), with 0/40 fiscal amount hallucinations observed in Level 1 (95% bound <= 8.81%). On the benchmark, the system achieves 86.50% strict Top-1 accuracy (+10.00 pp over a binary neural gate, p = 0.00453, p_Holm = 0.01172), pairing a 93.00% conditional safe upper bound with a 70.87% dropout-adjusted effective resolution after accounting for 53.33% citizen drop-off in clarification menus.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.CY · cs.IR
arXiv ↗PDF ↗