跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+0已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-09 07:12 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-08 06:02各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-08 10:12 — 2026-11-09 10:12(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-09 07:12最近发现新增版本:2026-11-08 06:02库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-06 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

17,100 已收录论文14,661 AI 相关4,057 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-09 07:10(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.03111

COVE: A Task-Adaptive, Code-Based Ensemble for Proactive Verification of LLM Outputs

Anjaney Shrivastava, Dharmala Hrudai Aditya

原文摘要

Large Language Models (LLMs) are now embedded in enterprise workflows, yet their outputs remain prone to hallucinations: plausible-sounding but factually incorrect or malformed content. Most verification approaches are reactive, detecting errors only after generation and often spending additional expensive LLM calls to do so. We present COVE, a task-adaptive, code-based ensemble that takes the opposite stance: it prevents errors before generation and validates structure and consistency afterwards using six deterministic, pure-Python innovations that add no extra LLM calls. On an internal evaluation spanning 11 text datasets (1,020 examples) and 4 image datasets (200 examples), COVE lifts text accuracy from a 45.2% unverified baseline to 82.1% (an 81.7% relative improvement), improves image accuracy by 69.5%, and reduces token usage by 48 to 96% (simulated cost model), at a measured verification overhead of 0.26 ms per output (excluding the LLM call). This article describes the engineering design of each innovation (with pseudocode and the exact parameters we use), the measured impact, an ablation of every component, and the practical lessons learned from deploying code-based verification in enterprise pipelines.

cs.SE