跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+1691新增论文
+1393其中 AI 相关
+98已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-10 12:17 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-10 12:22各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-09 12:30 — 2026-11-10 12:30(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-10 12:17最近发现新增版本:2026-11-10 12:22库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-09 00:55

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

19,579 已收录论文16,681 AI 相关5,189 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-10 12:16(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.10677

Safe Offline Reinforcement Learning using Behavior Regularisation and Latent Feasibility Guidance

Mahesh Keswani, Parth Bhardwaj, Ankur Kumar, Raunak P. Bhattacharyya

原文摘要

Safe offline reinforcement learning (RL) seeks to learn policies that maximize return while satisfying safety constraints, using a static dataset. To characterize state-wise safety, reachability analysis identifies the feasible region, defined as the set of states from which constraints can be satisfied at every future step. Policies are commonly extracted from learned value functions with advantage-weighted regression (AWR). However, AWR relies on exponentiated weights that amplify value estimation errors, whereas behavior-regularized policy gradient methods directly utilize the action gradient of the value function and often make more effective use of learned critics. We propose Feasibility-Optimized Conditional Actor Learning (FOCAL), a method that incorporates behavior-regularized policy gradients into a conditional variational autoencoder (CVAE) actor. FOCAL optimizes this policy using a first-order objective partitioned by feasibility, updating the actor to increase return on transitions estimated to be feasible and to reduce constraint violations on transitions estimated to be infeasible. During inference, FOCAL dynamically adjusts the scale of the latent prior according to the estimated feasibility of the state to adjust the conservatism of action sampling. Theoretically, we show that for AWR, the policy update variance depends exponentially on the advantage error, whereas for FOCAL it scales linearly with the variance of the value estimation error. Across the DSRL benchmark, FOCAL satisfies the constraints on all evaluated tasks while achieving competitive or higher returns compared to baselines.

cs.LG