跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+2471新增论文
+2025其中 AI 相关
+163已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-10 17:27 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-10 15:22各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-09 17:49 — 2026-11-10 17:49(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-10 17:27最近发现新增版本:2026-11-10 15:22库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-10 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

20,643 已收录论文17,531 AI 相关5,643 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-10 17:26(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.09232

RAG-Enhanced LLMs for Interactive Explainability in Clinical Decision Support Systems

Lorenzo Mannocci, Francesca Naretto, Lucia Passaro, Anna Monreale

原文摘要

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly embedded in high-risks decision-making systems across domains such as healthcare, finance, and the judicial system. As reliance on predictive models grows, so does the demand for Explainable AI (XAI) to ensure transparency, trust, and interpretability. However, existing XAI approaches often fail to present explanations in a format accessible to domain experts, limiting their practical utility. Large Language Models (LLMs) have recently emerged as a bridge between complex models and end-users, offering natural language explanations. Yet, their use introduces new risks, including hallucinated outputs and lack of source traceability. To address these challenges, we propose a Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS) that not only combines standard predictive models with XAI techniques but also incorporates a Retrieval-Augmented Generation module as an interactive enhancer. This module grounds explanations in verified medical knowledge, reformulates technical outputs into a human-like format, and enables users-such as clinicians-to actively query the system. By fostering an interactive, human-in-the-loop environment, our approach empowers domain experts to explore model decisions, contextualize explanations, and build trust in AI-assisted diagnostics. The study concludes with preliminary experiments validating the proposed methodology.

cs.AI · cs.HC · cs.LG