跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+2已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-08 09:15 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-08 06:02各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-07 09:16 — 2026-11-08 09:16(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-08 09:15最近发现新增版本:2026-11-08 06:02库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-06 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

17,100 已收录论文14,661 AI 相关4,057 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-08 09:13(北京时间)
版本更新 · v3arXiv:2606.22361

First-Token Broadcasters: Mechanistic Origins of Language Identity and Distributed Robustness in Transformers

Arjun Pillai, Christian Hoang, Anjelo Jann Laroza

原文摘要

How is language identity represented and causally maintained in transformers, and to what extent do the mechanisms identified in one language set transfer to other languages and training regimes? We introduce Language Identity Head Ablation (LIHA), a causal intervention that zeros each attention head individually and measures the resulting language switch rate. Across our multilingual evaluation sets, LIHA identifies heads whose ablation has disproportionate effects on output language. In GPT-2, a small set of first-token broadcaster heads---led by L6H1 (switch rate 0.32, 3.23$σ$ above the population mean)---attend persistently to the first prompt token across query positions. The combination of persistent first-token attention and causal sensitivity suggests that these heads participate in maintaining output language. Following ablation, first-token attention increases in heads above the ablated layer for the ablations tested (permutation test against random five-head sets, $p < 10^{-5}$). We do not test whether these heads functionally compensate for the ablated head. We also compare Qwen2.5-1.5B-Base and Qwen2.5-1.5B-Instruct, which are matched in architecture and parameter count but differ in training history. The base model is nearly flat (max SR$=$0.016, 200/336 heads at SR$=$0.0), whereas the instruct model concentrates causal influence at layer~0, led by L0H5 (SR$=$0.224, 8.93$σ$ above the mean). Finally, GPT-2 heads identified from the European-language experiments show no observed switch effects on the tested Chinese and Russian prompts, while other early-layer heads do show effects. Because script, typology, and tokenization vary together in this comparison, these results do not isolate a specifically script-driven mechanism. Repository is available at https://github.com/ajlrza/First-Token-Broadcasters.

cs.CL · cs.AI