跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+2新增论文
+2其中 AI 相关
+0已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-13 00:53 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-12 06:37各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-12 01:01 — 2026-11-13 01:01(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-13 00:53最近发现新增版本:2026-11-12 06:37库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-11 08:00

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

21,675 已收录论文18,323 AI 相关6,056 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-13 00:50(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.11342

Agent Self-Improvement with Frozen Weights: The Added Value and Limits of Failure Traces

Arkid Mitra

原文摘要

We evaluate whether an AI agent's harness, the notes around its model, can learn from the agent's failure traces beyond a matched search that never sees them. It can, but less than it looks. We tested an open 9-billion-parameter model with fixed weights; a larger teacher model wrote its notes. On generated customer-service decisions, where both note writers were told the target rules, notes based on the agent's mistakes improved accuracy by 4.0 percentage points over notes from the same process with the mistakes withheld. That process alone, trying and keeping better-scoring notes, reached about 60% of the total improvement. In full customer-service conversations the same notes showed no demonstrated improvement. Separately, a strict screen of single lessons admitted two customer-service lessons, still awaiting tests on new data, and one tool-use lesson, written without seeing the agent's mistakes, which showed no demonstrated gain on new tool-use tasks. A neutral note with no procedure scored higher than the learned lessons (exploratory). A blind audit judged 146 of 240 tool-use test items defective.

cs.LG · cs.AI · cs.CL