跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+788新增论文
+627其中 AI 相关
+81已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-09 11:20 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-09 11:19各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-08 12:24 — 2026-11-09 12:24(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-09 11:20最近发现新增版本:2026-11-09 11:19库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-06 21:58

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

17,888 已收录论文15,288 AI 相关4,419 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-09 11:19(北京时间)
版本更新 · v3arXiv:2601.05416

头部何时离开?360度视频观看中的共享时序与运动时钟

When does the head leave? Shared timing and a movement clock in 360-degree video viewing

Arman Nik Khah, Arvin Bahreini, Ravi Prakash

AI 速读 基于摘要

基于四个公开头部追踪数据集,作者报告360度视频观看中同区域观众存在秒级同步离开现象,且距上次大幅头部运动的时间可提升离开预测,眼动追踪测试集上 gaze 滞后于头部启动约0.30秒。

cs.MM

查看原文摘要

A $360^\circ$ streaming system only needs high quality where the viewer faces, so knowing when a head will turn away matters as much as where it will go. Across four public head-tracking datasets, two used to fix and validate the method and two held out for testing, three patterns emerge on the held-out sets. First, viewers facing the same region turn away within a second of one another far more often than time-shifted traces allow. That estimate is about five times the pairwise threshold for a video timing one departure in ten, mapping to roughly one and a third to over twice that one-in-ten share. The excess co-departing fraction is 0.0422, with a 90% interval from 0.0279 to 0.0565. Second, time since the last large head movement improves held-out departure prediction beyond video and viewer effects. It adds 0.0793 nats per departure, a predictive dependence rather than proof of an internal timer. Third, on the eye-tracked test set, gaze crosses the region boundary after the head starts moving, lagging head onset by 0.30 s. Because headsets record continuous angles, a departure exists only after a rule marks when a settled hold ends once the head swings past a speed and angle threshold. Before touching the test sets, we picked one primary setting for the headline estimates above and tested 18 settings on synthetic traces with planted answers, requiring at least nine passing settings for robustness. Fifteen settings passed for the clock and all 15 valid settings confirm its gain; 8 passed for synchrony and all 8 valid settings agree, one short of the nine-setting bar; and 6 of 7 dual-validated settings agree on gaze lag. Synchrony validation drops from 17 or 18 passing settings under guessed noise to 8 under measured noise because zero-tolerance rules reject a small baseline offset, consistently positive at one dataset size, as datasets grow.