跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+367新增论文
+288其中 AI 相关
+33已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-09 10:18 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-09 10:17各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-08 11:06 — 2026-11-09 11:06(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-09 10:18最近发现新增版本:2026-11-09 10:17库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-06 12:44

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

17,467 已收录论文14,949 AI 相关4,222 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-09 10:16(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.08877

The Relational Capacity Framework: A Lens for AI-Mediated Relationality

Emily Tseng, Patrick Gage Kelley, Renee Shelby, Ashley M. Walker

原文摘要

A growing literature examines the impact of engaging with AI chatbots on our relationality: our ability to form relationships with others, maintain them through life's changes, and exit when needed. Currently, substantial work focuses on purpose-built AI companions (e.g. Replika, Character.AI), with less work investigating socioemotional uses of the more widely-used general-purpose chatbots. In this paper, we present a 100-person investigation into how people engage general-purpose AI for socioemotional needs. Participants' AI uses varied, from practicing specific social skills to seeking additional bandwidth and information as they navigated their social contexts. To explain this heterogeneity, we provide 8 states that describe how AI expands or contracts relationality for people with different levels of skills, bandwidth, and information. We then present a unified conceptual model for the role of technology in mediating human relationality, the Relational Capacity Framework, and outline future research designing appropriate roles for AI in human connection.

cs.HC · cs.AI · cs.CY