跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+1新增论文
+1其中 AI 相关
+0已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-13 07:07 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-13 06:39各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-12 08:31 — 2026-11-13 08:31(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-13 07:07最近发现新增版本:2026-11-13 06:39库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-11 08:00

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

21,676 已收录论文18,324 AI 相关6,056 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-13 07:05(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.13545

Closing the BF16-FP16 Convergence Speed Gap in RL Post-Training with Stochastic Rounding

Mahdi Nazemi, Oleg Rybakov, Tijmen Blankevoort, Asit Mishra, Carlo del Mundo

原文摘要

BF16 is widely used to pretrain large language models because it has the same dynamic range as FP32 and converges similarly to FP32 training. However, in reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards, where learning rates are typically low, we find that standard mixed-precision BF16 training converges more slowly than FP16 training at the same learning rate. We attribute this gap to weight sticking: when FP32 shadow weights are quantized to BF16 using round-to-nearest, small updates often leave the BF16 weights used for rollout generation and training unchanged. Consequently, several optimizer steps may be needed before updates to the shadow weights are reflected in the BF16 weights. Raising the BF16 learning rate reduces weight sticking and matches FP16's convergence speed, but it also increases the KL divergence from the reference model. We instead apply stochastic rounding when quantizing the FP32 shadow weights to BF16. This approach matches FP16's convergence speed across different models and datasets while reducing the KL divergence relative to BF16 training with a larger learning rate. Unlike FP16, it keeps BF16's wider dynamic range and needs no loss scaling.

cs.LG · stat.ML