Manipulation policies are evaluated predominantly by binary task success, which cannot tell whether the commanded gesture is the one the object's kinematics admit. We introduce Constraint-Referenced Strategy (CRS), which projects the commanded end-effector twist onto the object's joint axis, separating progress along the joint from off-constraint waste. CRS requires a joint model and a joint-following scripted controller derived from it, but no recorded demonstration or learned judge. On 74 simulated articulated objects, success registers three transfer failures as lower rates but attributes none, while the two CRS channels give each a distinct signature. A door-trained behavior-cloning policy opens drawers in 59 of 110 episodes, and in these passes it commands about $40\times$ the off-axis rotation of a drawer-trained policy's passes ($1.27$ vs.\ $0.032$~rad/s). Relative to a scripted controller scored with the same axis, CRS verdicts are unchanged under joint-axis errors up to $30^\circ$; absolute thresholds tolerate about $8^\circ$.
Failure diagnosers for robot manipulation are increasingly vision--language models (VLMs), trained and evaluated on single-arm failures produced by perturbing a successful demonstration. Bimanual tool use adds failures of other kinds: a tool that slips out of its socket while still held, two correct gestures made at different times, and attempts that fail for two reasons at once. On a simulated bimanual tool-use task whose failure causes are read from the recorded trace, we measure what each sensing channel lets a diagnoser tell. The tool's slip is read on the tool hand; which hand was late is read on both arms, while a sensor on one hand reads its own hand's delay and at most part of the other's; and whether a late attempt was also pushed too weakly is not identifiable from passive sensing when the tool hand is late. Within two attempts, a repair policy that escalates when the cause is not identifiable repairs as many failures as one told the true cause. A VLM's internal state carries the late hand almost perfectly, along a direction no closer to the one its answer reads than a random one; whether the answer reports it depends on the wording of the question.