跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+1151新增论文
+896其中 AI 相关
+86已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-06 13:13 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-06 13:12各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-05 15:34 — 2026-11-06 15:34(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-06 13:13最近发现新增版本:2026-11-06 13:12库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-06 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

17,100 已收录论文14,661 AI 相关4,055 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 3 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-06 13:11(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.04744

Optimal (Randomized) Compact Routing Schemes

Shiri Chechik, Avi Kadria, Gur Lifshitz, Liam Roditty

Compact routing schemes route messages along short paths while every vertex stores little information. We study the trade-off between the stretch and the storage of compact routing schemes in undirected graphs, in four models: labeled and name-independent schemes, with average or worst-case local storage. We improve the best known stretch in all four models. Our main result is a labeled routing scheme with expected stretch $2k-1$ and $\widetilde O(n^{1/k})$ average local storage, in which only the routing is randomized. Under the Erdős girth conjecture, no scheme with this storage has stretch below $2k-1$, so our scheme is optimal, up to polylogarithmic factors in the storage. With deterministic routing, we obtain stretch $\approx2.47k$, the best known deterministic stretch with average storage. Worst-case local storage is the classical setting of compact routing. The leading coefficient $4$ in the stretch $4k-5$ of Thorup and Zwick~[SPAA'01] was improved only by Chechik~[PODC'13], to $\approx3.68$ in unweighted graphs. In unweighted graphs, we obtain expected stretch $(\frac83k+O(1),O(k))$, and deterministic stretch $\approx3.05k$. Name-independent routing is harder, since the source knows only the name of the destination. The best known stretch with $\widetilde O(n^{1/k})$ local storage in unweighted graphs was $96k$, by Abraham, Gavoille, and Malkhi~[DISC'04]. We improve it by more than a factor of $8$. With average storage, we obtain expected stretch $4k-5$, which matches the labeled scheme of Thorup and Zwick. With worst-case storage in unweighted graphs, we obtain expected stretch $(8k+O(1),O(k))$. All our schemes for unweighted graphs extend to weighted graphs with a small loss in the stretch, and still improve the previous unweighted bounds.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.DS · cs.NI
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
版本更新 · v3arXiv:2610.29624

A Tight Space Lower Bound for Pivot-Based Distance Oracles

Avi Kadria, Liam Roditty

An approximate distance oracle (ADO) is a compact data structure that answers distance queries within a multiplicative \emph{stretch} $k$. The classical oracle of Thorup and Zwick~[STOC'01, JACM'05] has stretch $k=2\ell-1$ and uses $O(\ell n^{1+1/\ell})$ space, for every integer $\ell\ge1$. This trade-off is optimal for dense graphs under the Erdős girth conjecture. However, for sparse graphs ($m=O(n)$), their lower bound yields nothing beyond $Ω(m)$ space. The main result of this paper is a nearly tight lower bound for pivot-based $1$-hop ADOs in sparse graphs. A pivot-based $1$-hop ADO gives every vertex $\tilde{O}(1)$ pivots and returns as an estimate the length of a walk of the form $u\to p_u \to p_v \to v$, where $p_u$ is a pivot of $u$, $p_v$ is a pivot of $v$, and $p_u\to p_v$ is a stored distance. We observe that all the state-of-the-art ADOs with $\tilde{O}(1)$ query time are in fact pivot-based $1$-hop ADOs. We prove that every \emph{pivot-based} $1$-hop ADO with \emph{real} stretch $k$ requires $\widetildeΩ(m^{1+2/(k+1)})$ space, under the Erdős girth conjecture for graphs with constant degree. This matches the best known ADOs with $\tilde{O}(1)$ query time, at every known stretch, up to polylogarithmic factors. We also extend our lower bound to pivot-based ADOs with any constant number $β$ of hops, showing that they require $\widetildeΩ(m^{1+2/(β(k+1))})$ space. In addition, we obtain a tight lower bound for two-hop hopsets and improved lower bounds for general $β$-hop hopsets.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.DS
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.01297

Reading between the levels: new tools for the Thorup-Zwick hierarchy and their applications

Shiri Chechik, Gur Lifshitz, Avi Kadria, Liam Roditty

In this paper, we develop three new analytical tools for the Thorup-Zwick hierarchy: the Mixed-Level Growth, Two-Level Growth, and Long-Short Growth lemmas. Using these tools, we obtain improved approximate distance oracles (ADOs), and algorithms for $n$-pairs shortest paths ($n$-PSP), multiple-source shortest paths (MSSP), and $ST$-shortest paths, as well as new hopsets. One of our main results is a $(\frac 65 k+O(1))$-stretch ADO with $\tilde O(mn^{1/k})$ preprocessing time and space (where $\tilde O$ hides polylogarithmic factors), and $\tilde O(n^{1/k})$ query time, breaking, for sparse graphs, the $(2k-O(1))$-stretch barrier for ADOs with $\tilde O(n^{1+1/k})$ space and $\tilde O(n^{1/k})$ query time. In unweighted graphs, we also obtain a $(\frac 65 k+O(1),O(k))$-approximate ADO with $\tilde O(n^{1+1/k})$ space and $\tilde O(n^{1/k})$ query time. This also yields a $(\frac 65 k+O(1))$-approximation algorithm for $m$-pairs shortest paths ($m$-PSP) in $\tilde O(mn^{1/k})$ time, answering the question of Chechik, Hoch, and Lifshitz [SODA'25] of whether the $2k-O(1)$ barrier for $n$-PSP in $\tilde O(mn^{1/k})$ time can be broken. For unweighted graphs, we give a new analysis of the existing $\tilde O(mn^{1/k}+n^{1+2/k})$-time $n$-PSP algorithm of [Chechik et al., SODA'25], and show that, without any modification, it is a $(k,k-1)$-approximation, i.e., $d(u,v)\le\hat d(u,v)\le k\cdot d(u,v)+k-1$ for every queried pair. This improves its multiplicative factor from $\frac 43 k+O(1)$ to $k$, and the leading coefficient $k$ is tight for this algorithm. Moreover, for graphs with $m=Ω(n^{1+1/k})$, this answers the question of Dalirrooyfard et al. [FOCS'22] up to the additive $k-1$.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.DS
arXiv ↗PDF ↗