跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+1030新增论文
+790其中 AI 相关
+128已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-12 03:52 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-11 22:47各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-11 04:09 — 2026-11-12 04:09(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-12 03:52最近发现新增版本:2026-11-11 22:47库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-11 08:00

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

21,673 已收录论文18,321 AI 相关6,056 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-12 03:50(北京时间)
首次观测 · 记录 #1ACL Anthology · ACL 2026:acl:2026.acl-srw.48ACL Anthology · ACL 2026

CAL-Log: Cost-Aware Active Learning with Logarithmic Cognitive Effort Modeling and Online Adaptation to Human Annotation Behavior

Vihanga Supasan Kariyakaranage, Banuka Athuraliya

原文摘要

Active learning (AL) reduces labeled data requirements in NLP, yet most methods optimize label efficiency while ignoring annotation cost. Standard uncertainty sampling assumes uniform effort, leading to suboptimal resource allocation when documents vary in length. Supasan and Athuraliya (2026) introduced CAL-Log, a cost-aware AL variant using logarithmic cost modeling C(x)=α+β log(1+L(x)), where C(x) is the predicted annotation time for document x and L(x) is its token length, grounded in information foraging theory (Pirolli and Card, 1999) and psycholinguistic studies of human skimming (Rayner, 1998). This paper presents CAL-Log in full, extending that preliminary framework with two new contributions: temperature-scaled calibrated entropy and online per-annotator cost adaptation, which together resolve the cold-start calibration bottleneck identified in the prior work. Experiments on ten text classification benchmarks demonstrate a 3.3× speedup over BADGE (Batch Active learning by Diverse Gradient Embeddings; Ash et al., 2020) and 3.9× over Entropy sampling to reach F1=0.80, with large effect sizes (Cohen’s d>0.8). A live annotation deployment with preliminary user evaluation (N=7) confirms that the online cost model produces reading-speed classifications consistent with annotator self-reports, and that a transparency interface successfully communicates the scoring rationale to non-expert users.

cs.CL

Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 4: Student Research Workshop) · 2026 · 正式发表