跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+1072新增论文
+845其中 AI 相关
+94已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-10 06:03 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-09 13:22各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-09 06:43 — 2026-11-10 06:43(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-10 06:03最近发现新增版本:2026-11-09 13:22库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-07 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

18,172 已收录论文15,506 AI 相关4,527 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-10 06:02(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.08737

On Differentially Private Mechanisms for Linear Regression

Bardiya Aryanfard, Monika Henzinger, Farhood Rostamkhani

原文摘要

We study the classic least-squares linear regression problem under differential privacy (DP) in the batch and the continual observation setting. In the latter setting, the mechanism receives a stream of $n$ data points $(x_i,y_i)$ ($x_i\in\mathbb{R}^d$ and $y_i\in\mathbb{R}$) and must output an estimate of the optimal parameters at each time step $i$. Although differentially private linear regression has been extensively studied in the batch setting, the problem remains underexplored for the continual setting, with prior work being restricted to constrained linear regression and update time polynomial in $n$. In this work, we introduce ContinualAdaSSP, the first mechanism for unconstrained linear regression under continual differential privacy. Our mechanism's suboptimality gap is proportional to $\sqrt{d}\operatorname{polylog}(n)$. It requires $O(d^2\log{n})$ space and $O(d^2\log{n}+d^ω)$ update time, where $d$ is the dimension of the input space. We also study fundamental limits of differentially private linear regression by showing the first lower bounds for the box-constrained least-squares linear regression problem. Our lower bounds are proportional to $\min(n,\frac{\sqrt{d}}{\log^{1.5}d})$ for $(1,O(\frac{1}{n}))$-DP, and $\min(n,\frac{d}ε)$ for $ε$-DP, and are derived using a reduction from a fingerprinting code problem from [Peter et al., 2024], providing new insights into the inherent hardness of this canonical task. Our experimental evaluation on real-world datasets shows that the accuracy of our continual observation mechanism clearly outperforms any other known differentially private mechanism for this problem such as rerunning the batch algorithm at each time step.

cs.LG · cs.CR · cs.DS

新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.08351

一种新的有界空间动态模型中的连通性

Connectivity in a New Bounded-Space Dynamic Model

Bardiya Aryanfard, Monika Henzinger, John Kuszmaul, Jakob Nogler, Virginia Vassilevska Williams

AI 速读 基于摘要

论文提出一种有界工作空间的动态算法模型,并研究动态无向 s-t 连通性在该模型下的时间-空间权衡。

cs.DS

查看原文摘要

We introduce a new model for dynamic algorithms in which the algorithm has read-only oracle access to a dynamically changing input and random access to its own bounded workspace. It is a dynamic analogue of the time-space tradeoffs for static inputs studied in complexity theory, where only writable memory counts as space. We study dynamic undirected $s$-$t$ connectivity: after every edge update to an $n$-vertex graph, an algorithm with $S$ words of workspace must report whether $s$ and $t$ are connected. The graph is accessed via adjacency list queries (degree, $j$-th neighbor) or adjacency matrix queries. Our algorithms are randomized; our lower bounds hold for randomized algorithms with $cn$ bits of workspace, $c>0$ a small constant ($cn/\log n$ for the worst-case matrix bound). We prove: (1) With adjacency lists, worst-case time $\tildeΘ(n^2/S^2)$ per insertion is necessary and sufficient for incremental algorithms. (2) With an adjacency matrix, worst-case time $\tildeΩ(n^2/S)$ per insertion is necessary for incremental algorithms, and sufficient for $S\ge\sqrt{n}$. (3) With amortization, incremental algorithms achieve $\tilde O(n/S)$ time per insertion with adjacency lists and $\tilde O(n^2/S)$ with an adjacency matrix, while $\tildeΩ(\sqrt{n/S})$ and $\tildeΩ(n\sqrt{n/S})$, respectively, are necessary. (4) Fully dynamic algorithms need amortized time $\tildeΩ(n/S)$ per update with adjacency lists and $\tildeΩ(n^2/S)$ with an adjacency matrix, even on forests, where both bounds are tight (lists: under bounded degree). Conventional dynamic connectivity admits polylogarithmic update time with $Ω(n)$ words of space. In contrast, our lower bounds show that polynomial update time is necessary whenever $S\le n^{1-\varepsilon}$, even for a single pair of vertices and even for incremental algorithms with amortized guarantees.