跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+1151新增论文
+896其中 AI 相关
+86已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-06 21:37 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-06 13:12各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-05 22:06 — 2026-11-06 22:06(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-06 21:37最近发现新增版本:2026-11-06 13:12库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-06 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

17,100 已收录论文14,661 AI 相关4,055 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-06 21:31(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2610.38205

Fast Sparse $α$-Navigable Graph Construction with Improved Resource Augmentation

Alex Conway, Laxman Dhulipala, Martin Farach-Colton, Ben Landrum, Christopher Musco, Yarin Shechter, Torsten Suel, Richard Wen

Graph-based nearest neighbor search methods, which run greedy search on a directed graph over the data points, have surged in popularity in recent years. A common goal is to construct a search graph with the $α$-navigability property, which ensures that greedy search returns provably good approximate nearest neighbors and converges in few iterations. Increasing $α\geq 1$ improves accuracy and convergence rate, but requires more edges, which increases both space and search time. This tradeoff has motivated the study of algorithms for constructing a sparsest $α$-navigable graph for a given set of points. For any point set and any distance function, we show how to compute an $α$-navigable graph with at most $O(\log n)$ times as many edges as the sparsest $(1+\varepsilon)α$-navigable graph, in $O(n^ω\log(Δ)/\varepsilon)$ time, where $ω< 2.372$ is the matrix multiplication exponent and $Δ$ is the aspect ratio of the input. This improves on Khanna, Padaki, and Waingarten (SODA 2026), who achieve the same runtime but are only competitive with the sparsest $2(1+\varepsilon)α$-navigable graph. Since sparsity often increases rapidly with $α$ (typically $α\leq 1.1$), their bound can be significantly weaker. Previously, the best algorithm competing with the sparsest $(1+\varepsilon)α$-navigable graph required $\widetilde{O}(n^{2.5})$ time. Our techniques also extend to constructing sparse $τ$-monotonic graphs, another popular target in nearest neighbor search. Finally, we give a fine-grained complexity analysis suggesting that improving the $O(n^ω)$ running time is unlikely, or would require a very different approach. It is based on hardness results for problems related to verifying whether a graph is navigable, a topic of independent interest.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.DS
arXiv ↗PDF ↗