跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+2471新增论文
+2025其中 AI 相关
+163已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-11 02:52 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-10 15:22各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-10 03:48 — 2026-11-11 03:48(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-11 02:52最近发现新增版本:2026-11-10 15:22库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-10 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

20,643 已收录论文17,531 AI 相关5,643 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-11 02:51(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.12564

GHiML: VLM-Guided Hierarchical Multi-Label Learning with Applications to Benthic Imagery

Isaac Xu, Devi Ayyagari, Martin Gillis, Benjamin Misiuk, Craig J. Brown, Thomas Trappenberg

原文摘要

Vision language models (VLMs) encode substantial expert knowledge within their weights, yet their direct application to specialised classification domains such as benthic imagery remains limited. Meanwhile, vision transformers trained on these tasks rely predominantly on low-level visual latents (colours, textures, and shapes) that lack the higher-level reasoning humans employ for identification. We propose Guided Hierarchical Multi-Label (GHiML) learning, a pipeline that extracts conceptual latent variables from a VLM conditioned on training data, generates sample-relevant captions grounded in those variables, and fuses the resulting textual embeddings with image embeddings via cross-attention and a per-node gated router. We also introduce the inverted HML score ($d_{\mathrm{inv}}$), a similarity score that evaluates hierarchical multi-label predictions through graph traversal distance and a cardinality penalty, providing an interpretable alternative to existing measures, which are insensitive to realistic degradations in sparse, deep hierarchies. Experiments on BenthicNet, FathomNet and iNaturalist show that the router improves macro $F_1$ over the vision-only baseline by up to 6.7 pp and $d_{\mathrm{inv}}$ by up to 21.1 pp on in-domain benthic data, with gains persisting under distribution shift. Ablations locate the contribution of the text itself: on the multi-label biotic hierarchies, removing the per-sample text signal degrades $d_{\mathrm{inv}}$ while leaving macro $F_1$ unchanged, consistent with text acting through prediction cardinality rather than node discrimination, whereas iNaturalist, whose annotations are single-label, loses 18.7% of macro $F_1$. Our results support the hypothesis that VLMs contain exploitable specialised knowledge that, when appropriately elicited, can augment classification in domains where direct visual learning is insufficient.

cs.CV