Continuous Integration and Delivery (CI/CD) are fundamental to modern software development, yet configuring pipelines such as GitHub Actions (GHA) workflows remains complex and error-prone. Recent work has explored Transformer-based models for GHA workflow recommendation, but existing approaches typically model workflow steps as a single homogeneous generation task. This formulation overlooks a key distinction: reusable Actions are structured, ecosystem-level components, whereas project-specific Scripts encode local build, test, and deployment semantics. Consequently, current models struggle to capture the different forms of knowledge required for accurate workflow completion. In this work, we present FLOWSTEP, a framework for GHA workflow step completion that explicitly distinguishes between Action and Script generation. FLOWSTEP combines large language models (LLMs) with contrastive learning to better capture semantic relationships among workflow contexts, Actions, and Scripts. Evaluated on established benchmarks, FLOWSTEP improves end-to-end workflow step prediction accuracy from 38.23% to 51.09%. Beyond prediction accuracy, we further study whether LLM-as-a-judge can provide a more semantic evaluation of generated workflow steps. By comparing LLM-based assessments with human annotations, we find that the best-performing model configuration reaches substantial agreement with human ground truth (Krippendorff's alpha = 0.701), suggesting that LLM-as-a-judge can serve as a scalable complement to manual evaluation.
Ziang Chen Tsinghua University, Guannan Li, Fanlin Ji, Yipeng Kang National Key Laboratory of General Artificial Intelligence, Jiaqi Li Beijing Institute for General Artificial Intelligence, Muhan Zhang Peking University, Yangtao Zhang, Li Tianjiao 等 12 位作者
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong cross-domain capabilities, yet their competence in specialized professional tasks remains underexamined. Existing legal benchmarks evaluate isolated tasks or exam-style questions, failing to capture the procedural interdependencies and adjudicative rigor inherent in professional practice. To bridge this gap, we construct JurisBench, a vertical, depth-oriented, domain-specific benchmark designed to evaluate LLMs across key stages of Chinese civil litigation. JurisBench introduces a Linear Depth Simulation track that mirrors the cognitive workflow of professional judges through four sequential, dependency-aware phases: Cause of Action prediction, Focus of Disputes identification, Rationale of the Judgment generation, and Result of the Judgment determination. Results reveal an “illusion of competence”: state-of-the-art models exhibit marked performance degradation in end-to-end pipelines due to cascading error propagation. We identify precise statutory grounding as a persistent bottleneck, highlighting a critical gap between fluent linguistic output and judicial reliability. JurisBench shifts evaluation from isolated legal knowledge to workflow-level task execution, providing a diagnostic framework for legal AI and a template for benchmark design in specialized domains.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表