跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+7272新增论文
+6090其中 AI 相关
+125已有论文修订
+122新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-05 14:17 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-05 12:13各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-04 14:47 — 2026-11-05 14:47(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-05 14:17最近发现新增版本:2026-11-05 12:13库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-05 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

15,949 已收录论文13,765 AI 相关3,571 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-05 14:15(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2610.36711

PrivacyEvalClaw: A Tool-Augmented Deliberative Agent for Auditing Privacy Leakage in LLM Jailbreak Responses

Krishna Kanth Nakka, Yujun Wang, Shijie Zhou, Tu Nguyen, Gabriele Gelardi, Xuebing Zhou

Reliable evaluation is a critical bottleneck in privacy red-teaming of large language models (LLMs): determining whether a jailbreak response actually reveals personal information can be difficult when disclosures are indirect, contextual, partial, or obfuscated. Existing evaluation approaches increasingly rely on guard models and LLM-as-Judges, yet these evaluators may interpret the same response differently. To better characterize this evaluation setting, we conduct a systematic study of privacy evaluators and find substantial disagreement, particularly in ambiguous cases that require additional evidence or targeted analysis to resolve. Motivated by these findings, we introduce \textsc{PrivacyEvalClaw}, a training-free deliberative agent for evaluating privacy leakage in LLM jailbreak responses. Rather than relying on isolated single-pass judgments, PrivacyEvalClaw treats evaluators and analysis modules as tools, adaptively gathers evidence, investigates uncertain disclosures, and reconciles conflicting signals before producing a final judgment. Our primary experiments use pairwise LLM-as-Judge evaluation of complete trajectories, showing that PrivacyEvalClaw achieves favorable win rates against competing baselines across outcome, process, and overall quality, while producing explicit reasoning traces that make the evaluation process more transparent and auditable.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.CR
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
首次观测 · 记录 #1ACL Anthology · ACL 2026:acl:2026.acl-long.1118ACL Anthology · ACL 2026

LAMCL: A Length-aware Momentum Contrastive Learning Framework for Multiscale Machine-Revised Text Detection

Bing Zhou, Zhe Huang, Shilei Tan University of Science and Technology of China, Kai Zhao Chongqing University, Zhou Yongcheng

Detecting machine-revised text that exhibits subtle lexical differences from the original human-generated text remains a challenge. Recent detection methods, including watermarking-based, logit-based, and training-based models, struggle to capture the fine-grained semantic differences, especially for short texts. To address this issue, we propose Length-aware Momentum Contrastive Learning (LAMCL), a novel framework for multiscale machine-revised text detection that integrates two core modules. To enhance the discriminative semantic features, the Enhance Before Detection (EBD) module first fuses the original detected text with the counterpart processed by a Large Language Model (LLM), and then measures semantic consistency to distinguish between machine-revised and human-generated text. Meanwhile, based on the Momentum Contrastive Learning (MCL) framework, the Length-aware Weighting (LW) module leverages text length and label information for hard negative sampling, mitigating the ambiguity of short text attribution and boosting the robustness of representation learning. Experimental results demonstrate that our method outperforms the existing detectors in identifying multiscale machine-revised text across diverse practical scenarios, tasks, and LLMs. The code is available at https://github.com/hangtze/LAMCL.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.CL

Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表

ACL Anthology · ACL 2026 ↗PDF ↗