跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

采集已暂停
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+0已有论文修订
+0新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:等待完成 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-02 00:39各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-03 14:48 — 2026-11-04 14:48(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:尚未完成最近发现新增版本:2026-11-02 00:39库内论文最新更新时间:2026-10-30 01:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

8,677 已收录论文7,675 AI 相关1,866 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。

找到 4 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序等待首次采集
版本更新 · v4arXiv:2503.06684

PixelPonder: Dynamic Patch Adaptation for Enhanced Multi-Conditional Text-to-Image Generation

Yanjie Pan, Qingdong He, Zhengkai Jiang, Pengcheng Xu, Chaoyi Wang, Jinlong Peng, Haoxuan Wang, Yun Cao 等 12 位作者

Recent advances in diffusion-based text-to-image generation have demonstrated promising results through visual condition control. However, existing ControlNet-like methods struggle with compositional visual conditioning - simultaneously preserving semantic fidelity across multiple heterogeneous control signals while maintaining high visual quality, where they employ separate control branches that often introduce conflicting guidance during the denoising process, leading to structural distortions and artifacts in generated images. To address this issue, we present PixelPonder, a novel unified control framework, which allows for effective control of multiple visual conditions under a single control structure. Specifically, we design a patch-level adaptive condition selection mechanism that dynamically prioritizes spatially relevant control signals at the sub-region level, enabling precise local guidance without global interference. Additionally, a time-aware control injection scheme is deployed to modulate condition influence according to denoising timesteps, progressively transitioning from structural preservation to texture refinement and fully utilizing the control information from different categories to promote more harmonious image generation. Extensive experiments demonstrate that PixelPonder surpasses previous methods across different benchmark datasets, showing superior improvement in spatial alignment accuracy while maintaining high textual semantic consistency.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.CV
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
新论文 · v1arXiv:2610.37201

Does Your Generalist Skill Optimizer Really Incentivize Agentic Tasks? Rethinking Skill Optimization via Bipartite Attribution

Jiawei Zhou, Bo Peng, Yuxuan Huang, Ming Zhang, Youbang Sun, Xiang Wang, Chaochao Lu

Skill optimizers adapt an agent to long-horizon tasks, such as repairing a terminal environment, by rewriting its skill, a natural-language procedure in its context, and keeping the edits that raise success on a small dev set. On such tasks success is noisy, so a gain on a small dev set does not show that an edit helps, and a success score does not show what the edit costs. We introduce BiPA, which replays an optimizer's acceptance rule on candidates identical to its seed to measure what selection alone reports, and records each episode as a bipartite graph of turns and the text they read to trace extra input tokens to the behavior behind them. Across three optimizers, three agentic benchmarks and two models, the learned skills succeed about as often as their hand-written seed, 0.1 points higher on average. Their dev gains vanish on test: keeping the best of several candidates on at most 30 tasks reports gains this large even when none changed. They read about 16% more input tokens: the optimizers almost always add rules, half to re-check work and some to act one call at a time, and the agent follows them as extra turns, each re-sending the whole conversation. Four principles follow: accept an edit only if its gain exceeds what selection alone reports; charge it for the turns it adds, not for its length; let the editor delete and merge rules; show it what earlier rules cost. Code is available at https://github.com/valleysprings/BiPA.git.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.AI
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
新论文 · v1arXiv:2610.34892

Order-selection Prophet Inequality (Almost) Goes I.I.D

Bo Peng, Zhihao Gavin Tang

We study the order-selection prophet inequality. A gambler knows the distributions of independent nonnegative random values, chooses the order in which to inspect them, and may irrevocably accept at most one value, at the time it is revealed. Since the order is irrelevant when the values are i.i.d., no algorithm can guarantee more than the optimal i.i.d.\ ratio $Γ_\star\approx0.74544$ of the expected maximum. We give an algorithm with competitive ratio $0.74500001$, less than $4.5\times10^{-4}$ below this bound. The algorithm samples independent arrival times and uses item-dependent thresholds. It is designed so that, conditional on its value, every item is selected with probability equal to a fixed fraction of its probability of being the maximum. We show that the constructions of this form that apply one local rule to every item are exactly those given by an allocation kernel, that is, by a coupling of two uniform random variables. Requiring every rarely winning item to follow the optimal i.i.d.\ threshold path singles out a baseline kernel, for which we prove analytically a ratio $Γ_0\approx0.7389$, defined through a one-dimensional control problem. Our final kernel perturbs this baseline, and its guarantee combines analytic estimates with a rigorous computer-assisted certificate.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.DS · cs.GT
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
首次观测 · 记录 #1ACL Anthology · ACL 2026:acl:2026.acl-long.707ACL Anthology · ACL 2026

When "Correct" Is Not Safe: Can We Trust Functionally Correct Patches Generated by Code Agents?

Yibo Peng, James Song, Lei Li, Xinyu Yang Carnegie Mellon University, Mihai Christodorescu Google, Ravi Mangal Colorado State University, Corina Pasareanu, Haizhong Zheng CMU, Carnegie Mellon University 等 9 位作者

Code agents are increasingly trusted to autonomously fix bugs on platforms such as GitHub, yet their security evaluation focuses almost exclusively on functional correctness. In this paper, we reveal a novel type of threat to real-world code-agents: functionally correct yet vulnerable (FCV) patches, which pass all test cases but contain vulnerable code. With our proposed FCV-Attack, we demonstrate that SOTA LLMs (e.g., ChatGPT and Claude) and agent scaffolds (e.g., SWE-agent and OpenHands) are all vulnerable to this FCV threat; across 12 agent-model combinations on SWE-Bench, the attack only requires black-box access and a single query to the code agent to perform the attack. For example, for CWE-538 (information exposure vulnerability), the FCV-Attack attains an attack success rate of 40.7% on GPT-5 Mini + OpenHands. Our results reveal an important security threat overlooked by current evaluation paradigms and urge the development of security-aware defenses for code agents.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.CL

Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表

ACL Anthology · ACL 2026 ↗PDF ↗