跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+1已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-08 05:06 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-07 17:43各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-07 05:35 — 2026-11-08 05:35(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-08 05:06最近发现新增版本:2026-11-07 17:43库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-06 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

17,100 已收录论文14,661 AI 相关4,056 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-08 05:04(北京时间)
版本更新 · v4arXiv:2512.02436

Agentic AI for Clustering and Relationship Discovery in Prediction Markets

Agostino Capponi, Alfio Gliozzo, Brian Zhu

原文摘要

Prediction market platforms list thousands of contracts whose logical and economic connections are implicit in their resolution rules. We introduce a hierarchical agentic reduction (HAR) pipeline for constructing inspectable cross-event relation graphs and a behavioral benchmark for evaluating their alignment with market prices. This partitions a catalog of prediction markets, specified by question and resolution text, into topic clusters, applies typed LLM reasoning to small batches, and proposes signed relations with rationales between specific markets. We evaluate semantic relation graphs spanning eight monthly Kalshi catalogs (February to September 2026). Using data from 30.3 million trades, we compute a benchmark that compares linked pairs' signed price-change correlations with those of matched, unlinked controls from the same topic cluster on identical timestamps. Under full-sample and leave-first-week-out evaluation, relations identified by our pipeline exhibit higher signed Pearson price-change correlations, with statistical significance, than matched within-topic controls. This increase also appears under Spearman correlation and becomes larger among relations labeled as medium or high strength. This benchmark provides a criterion for comparing relation-discovery methods against observations beyond their input text, and our results indicate the ability of agentic AI and LLM reasoning to identify meaningful relations between individual markets in connected Web marketplaces.

cs.AI