跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

采集已暂停
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+0已有论文修订
+0新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:等待完成 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-02 00:39各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-03 06:49 — 2026-11-04 06:49(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:尚未完成最近发现新增版本:2026-11-02 00:39库内论文最新更新时间:2026-10-30 01:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

8,677 已收录论文7,675 AI 相关1,866 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序等待首次采集
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2509.00924

When is Fine-Tuning Scalable? Certified Recovery from Noisy Data and Linear-Cost Fine-Tuning on Structured Task Shifts

Anastasis Kratsios, Tin Sum Cheng, Bum Jun Kim, Daniel Roy

Transformers often transfer across related tasks with little fine-tuning; we study this question in noisy nonparametric regression for continuous maps $f,g:[0,1]^d\to\mathbb{R}^D$, representing the source and shifted tasks, using a single-query, single-head transformer $\mathcal{T}(\cdot)=V\operatorname{Softmax}(-α(\cdot,K))$ with $\ell^{\infty}$-based alignment scores $α$. Rather than assume that gradient-based training reaches an empirical risk minimizer, we give a model-specific two-stage procedure \textbf{certifying} source-task recovery and out-of-distribution (OOD) adaptation. With high probability, the resulting attention head recovers $f$ to arbitrary accuracy $\varepsilon>0$ in every fixed $L^p([0,1]^d)$ norm, $1\le p<\infty$, from noisy observations. For Lipschitz targets, its rate is minimax-optimal up to logarithmic factors without assuming oracle access to an asymptotic ERM. If $D=1$ and $f$ is Pfaffian than the values matrix factors into $AC$ with $A$ scaling at-most linearly $\mathcal{O}(\varepsilon^{-1})$ in the reciprocal approximation error $\varepsilon>0$. Importantly, our training procedure encodes all our identified (potentially) shared geometric structure from $f$ only into the values matrix factor $C$ and the keys matrix $K$ allowing for rapid access, and all $f$-specific structure only into $A$. Our main result concerns the OOD phase; where we identify geometric structures, which if shared by the source $f$ and OOD $g$ task; then only only the values matrix factor $A$ needs to be fine-tuned to guarantee an $L^p$-recovery of $g$. Critically, fine-tuning only $A$ is a convex problem which involving an \textit{at-most linear} number of parameters $\mathcal{O}(\varepsilon^{-1})$; dramatically cutting down on the worst-case scaling of $\mathcal{O}(\varepsilon^{-\mathbf{d}})$ unavoidable in the source-training phase.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

stat.ML · cs.LG · cs.NE · math.NA · math.PR
arXiv ↗PDF ↗