Roger Zhe Li, Aghiles Salah, Mete Sertkan, Changhong Jin, Yingjie Niu, Ruihai Dong, Barry Smyth
Traditional recommender systems rely on arbitrary integer IDs to identify items, which carry no semantic information and force models to learn representations from interaction data. While leveraging content information can partially mitigate cold-start, this paradigm inherently suffers from exploding embedding tables and scenario-specific architectures. Recent years have seen the emergence of semantic IDs, which encode semantic information directly into the item identity, reflecting content, hierarchy, and relationships. This framework addresses the above limitations by offering a principled way to encode large-scale semantic information into item identity, benefiting both generative and discriminative applications and unlocking more native unification across modalities, domains, and tasks. This tutorial traces the evolution from raw IDs to semantic IDs as a scalable means of information utilization, offering a comprehensive review of their development and applications across multi-modality, cold-start, and cross-domain recommendation. Hands-on exercises guide attendees through building and evaluating semantic IDs, training models, and exploring cross-domain transfer. We conclude by discussing open challenges, including dynamic semantic IDs and multi-stakeholder utility. All materials of the tutorial could be found at the official website https://semantic-id-tutorial.github.io.
Cheng Xu, Changhong Jin University College Dublin, Yingjie Niu, Nan Yan Bebxy, Yuke Mei Bebxy Research, Shuhao Guan, Liming Chen Dalian University of Technology, Tahar Kechadi University College Dublin
The rapid development of Large Language Models (LLMs) has transformed fake news detection and fact-checking tasks from simple classification to complex reasoning. However, evaluation frameworks have not kept pace. Current benchmarks are static, making them vulnerable to benchmark data contamination (BDC) and ineffective at assessing reasoning under temporal uncertainty. To address this, we introduce LiveFact a continuously updated benchmark that simulates the real-world “fog of war” in misinformation detection. LiveFact uses dynamic, temporal evidence sets to evaluate models on their ability to reason with evolving, incomplete information rather than on memorized knowledge. We propose a dual-mode evaluation: Classification Mode for final verification and Inference Mode for evidence-based reasoning, along with a component to monitor BDC explicitly. Tests with 22 LLMs show that open-source Mixture-of-Experts models, such as Qwen3-235B-A22B, now match or outperform proprietary state-of-the-art systems. More importantly, our analysis finds a significant “reasoning gap.” Capable models exhibit epistemic humility by recognizing unverifiable claims in early data slices-an aspect traditional static benchmarks overlook. LiveFact sets a sustainable standard for evaluating robust, temporally aware AI verification.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表