Visual perception is evolving from passive recognition toward active, task-oriented observation. We investigate GUI grounding as a scalable source of spatial supervision for learning observation behaviors that transfer beyond interfaces. We introduce LBS (Look Beyond Screens), a vision-language model trained through supervised initialization on teacher-generated GUI grounding trajectories, followed by reinforcement learning for multi-turn crop-and-inspect decisions. Under fixed inference settings, LBS models based on Qwen3.5-35B-A3B and Qwen3.8-27B consistently improve over their corresponding baselines. Gains beyond supervised fine-tuning transfer to PerceptionBench for both backbones and to HR-Bench and ChartQAPro for Qwen3.5-35B-A3B, supporting observation strategies that generalize beyond GUI-specific imitation. Further analysis suggests complementary roles for the two stages: SFT establishes visual inspection primitives, while RL improves their downstream effectiveness. These findings support GUI grounding as a practical supervision paradigm for transferable active visual perception and broader multimodal reasoning. Our code and model are publicly available at https://github.com/inclusionAI/UI-Venus/tree/LBS and https://huggingface.co/inclusionAI/LBS-27B, respectively.
Chenlong Yin Pennsylvania State University, Zeyang Sha Ant Group, Shiwen Cui ant group, Changhua Meng Ant Group, Zechao Li Nanjing University of Science and Techonolgy
Enhancing the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) is a key strategy for building agents that ”think then act”. However, recent observations, like OpenAI’s o3, suggest a paradox: stronger reasoning often coincides with increased hallucination, yet no prior work has systematically examined whether reasoning enhancement itself causes tool hallucination. We address this gap with the central question: Does strengthening reasoning increase tool hallucination? To answer this, we introduce SimpleToolHalluBench, a diagnostic benchmark measuring tool hallucination in two failure modes: (i) no tool available, and (ii) only distractor tools available. Through controlled experiments, we establish three key findings. First, we demonstrate a causal relationship: progressively enhancing reasoning through RL increases tool hallucination proportionally with task performance gains. Second, this effect transcends overfitting—training on non-tool tasks (e.g., mathematics) still amplifies subsequent tool hallucination. Third, the effect is method-agnostic, appearing when reasoning is instilled via supervised fine-tuning and when it is merely elicited at inference by switching from direct answers to step-by-step thinking. We also evaluate mitigation strategies including Prompt Engineering and Direct Preference Optimization (DPO), revealing a fundamental reliability–capability trade-off: reducing hallucination consistently degrades utility. Mechanistically, Reasoning RL disproportionately collapses tool-reliability–related representations, and hallucinations surface as amplified divergences concentrated in late-layer residual streams. These findings reveal that current reasoning enhancement methods inherently amplify tool hallucination, highlighting the need for new training objectives that jointly optimize for capability and reliability. Our implementation is provided at https://github.com/albert-y1n/Reasoning_Trap.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表