跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+4258新增论文
+3371其中 AI 相关
+108已有论文修订
+122新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-05 00:46 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-05 01:48各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-04 01:48 — 2026-11-05 01:48(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-05 00:46最近发现新增版本:2026-11-05 01:48库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-04 08:00

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

12,935 已收录论文11,046 AI 相关3,088 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-05 00:44(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2610.35338

Who Pays for Thinking? Billing Hidden Reasoning Tokens in Model Cloud Contracts

Chao Feng, Burkhard Stiller

In token-priced language model services, users can see the prompts they submit and the answers they receive, but may also pay for internal reasoning and candidate answers that are not shown in the final response. This paper develops a three-party service model to study how charging for this intermediate computation shapes providers' decisions and social welfare. Users purchase answers from a model firm that pays an execution cloud, with either supplier controlling the computation budget. The model separates user billing from upstream payments and identifies when metered pricing encourages excessive generation, when fixed service prices restrict valuable computation, and how responsibility for execution costs changes these choices. A LiveCodeBench study measures answer quality, latency, token use, and resource consumption across five model deployments, with numerical billing comparisons for the three covered by archived tariffs. At equal average charges on the reference workload, the calibrated comparisons show that billing structure changes both service participation and the computation budgets suppliers select. For accepted services with different budgets, the measured outcomes define the user-value thresholds at which their welfare ranking reverses. Metered pricing yields higher welfare when the additional inference it induces creates net social value, whereas fixed service pricing is preferable when the costs of that computation outweigh its benefits.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.GT
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
首次观测 · 记录 #1ACL Anthology · ACL 2026:acl:2026.acl-industry.2ACL Anthology · ACL 2026

Smarter, not Bigger: Fine-Tuned RAG-Enhanced LLMs for Automotive Hardware-in-the-Loop Testing

Chao Feng, Zihan Liu, Siddhant Gupta, Jan von der Assen

Hardware-in-the-Loop (HIL) testing is essential for automotive validation but suffers from fragmented and underutilized test artifacts. This paper presents HIL-GPT, an industry-deployed retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) system that integrates semantic retrieval with domain-adapted large language models to support test engineers in real-world HIL workflows. The system combines domain-specific embeddings to enable traceable retrieval of test cases and requirements under industrial latency and cost constraints. Through empirical evaluation, we show that compact, domain-adapted models can achieve a favorable trade-off among accuracy, latency, and cost compared to larger general-purpose models, challenging the assumption that larger models are always preferable in industrial NLP systems. An A/B user study further confirms that HIL-GPT improves perceived helpfulness, truthfulness, and satisfaction over general-purpose LLMs.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.CL

Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 6: Industry Track) · 2026 · 正式发表

ACL Anthology · ACL 2026 ↗PDF ↗