让下一篇重要论文，不再错过。

原文摘要

As vision-language models (VLMs) move toward interpreting medical images directly, their outputs increasingly include not just a label but a stated confidence and a written justification. Yet the field still predominantly evaluates VLMs using just accuracy. We evaluate the coherence between answer, confidence, and explanation across four VLMs on breast density and BI-RADS categorization, using two mammography datasets. We perform controlled perturbations of the question, multiple choice option orders, and the images and assess changes in the three outputs. Our results suggest confidence does not decrease even as the mammography image is changed. Shuffling the options also changes most VLMs' answers. Notably, there are cases where a model's own stated reasoning contradicts its final answer, a distinction accuracy alone cannot capture but one that governs whether an AI-generated answer can be trusted.