Mengze Hong, Ziwei Shang, Di Liang, Zijian Li, Liang Zhu, Hongyu Shan, Robin Zhou, Minlong Peng 等 12 位作者
Real-time omnimodal assistants are expected to support people in everyday life, but audiovisual understanding alone does not establish whether they can provide timely and appropriate help. We introduce Omni-Life, a benchmark grounded in real-world user needs, deployment scenarios, and device-dependent observations. It combines controlled video synthesis for hazardous situations and edge cases with annotated real-world videos under a shared temporal protocol. The benchmark contains 400 videos: 290 requiring assistance, with 555 required intervention events, and 110 requiring silence throughout to test whether models can withhold unnecessary responses when no assistance is needed. We evaluate twelve configurations featuring mainstream real-time omnimodal models, jointly assessing event coverage, response content, timing, and unwanted output. At most 4.48% of videos requiring assistance are handled completely correctly. To examine practical deployment strategies, we study task reminders and response-latency tolerance. Reminders can improve recall by 17.12 percentage points but add approximately 4.6 unwanted responses per minute of reference silence. Increasing latency tolerance by 10s improves recall by at most 5.95 percentage points. These results show that existing models remain insufficient to deliver reliable assistance in real-life applications, calling for tailored model optimization in instruction following, timely proactive intervention, and withholding responses when assistance is not needed.
Mengze Hong, Xia Zeng, Zeyang Lei, Sheng Wang, Chen Jason Zhang, Di Jiang, Taiming Fu, Jinfeng Huang 等 16 位作者
As AI assistants serve millions of users daily, evaluating user experience (UX) beyond general model capability has become increasingly important. We present \textbf{UXBench}, the first user-centric benchmark grounded in real user feedback signals for evaluating preference alignment and dialogue generation. The benchmark consists of three interconnected tasks, UX Judge, UX Eval, and UX Recovery, with 7,400 test instances extracted from over 70K interaction logs of a mainstream Chinese AI assistant. The dataset closely reflects real user distributions, covering 8 scenarios, 83 domains, and diverse failure patterns that pose severe challenges. Extensive experiments on 26 frontier language models provide novel insights into how well models perceive user experience and how improvements in model capability contribute to better dialogue engagement. Through analyses of model behavior and performance gaps, we document six important findings, demonstrating that user feedback prediction is a learnable capability and revealing different aspects that influence user experience. UXBench establishes a new evaluation landscape and calls for greater attention to tailored UX optimization, contributing toward a user-centric scaling law for the development of successful AI assistants. The full project is released at https://github.com/mengze-hong/UXBench.
Jiahao Wu, Ning Lu, Shengcai Liu, Kun Wang, Yanting Yang, Baijiong Lin, Chen Jason Zhang, Li Qing 等 9 位作者
Reinforcement learning (RL) has become essential for post-training large language models (LLMs) in reasoning tasks. While scaling rollouts can stabilize training and enhance performance, the computational overhead is a critical issue. In algorithms like GRPO, multiple rollouts per prompt incur prohibitive costs, as a large portion of prompts provide negligible gradients and are thus of low utility. To address this problem, we investigate how to select high-utility prompts before the rollout phase. Our experimental analysis reveals that sample utility is non-uniform and evolving: the strongest learning signals concentrate at the ``learning edge", the intersection of intermediate difficulty and high uncertainty, which shifts as training proceeds. Motivated by this, we propose HIVE (History-Informed and online-VErified prompt selection), a dual-stage framework for data-efficient RL. HIVE utilizes historical reward trajectories for coarse selection and employs prompt entropy as a real-time proxy to prune instances with stale utility. By evaluating HIVE across multiple math reasoning benchmarks and models, we show that HIVE yields significant rollout efficiency without compromising performance.