跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+6109新增论文
+5222其中 AI 相关
+108已有论文修订
+122新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-05 07:04 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-05 06:17各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-04 08:59 — 2026-11-05 08:59(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-05 07:04最近发现新增版本:2026-11-05 06:17库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-04 08:00

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

14,786 已收录论文12,897 AI 相关3,089 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-05 07:02(北京时间)
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2610.39562

Raincheck: Deferred Multimodal Prefill for Efficient Multi-Turn MLLM Inference

Wenjie Huang, Jun Zhang, Hongyaoxing Gu, Haoyang Huang, Tianqi Xu, Xinyue Hao, Xinyi Hu, Xinle Du 等 13 位作者

Multi-turn conversations with multimodal large language models (MLLMs) reuse input context, but long multimodal inputs increase time to first token (TTFT). Query-aware hard pruning reduces prefill tokens but permanently excludes information that later questions may require. We propose Raincheck, a framework for deferred multimodal prefill that decouples initial token selection from later information availability. An existing pruning method selects tokens for initial prefill; Raincheck preserves and progressively prefills unselected tokens in source order using unused compute capacity during decode. Unfinished prefill continues after answer return during available scheduling gaps. Attention visibility control and affine state mapping enable context updates after generation begins in full-attention and hybrid recurrent models. Prefill-decode fusion reduces repeated weight reads. We evaluate Qwen3-VL-8B and Qwen3.5-9B with 30% initial multimodal-token retention. Across both models and four pruning methods, Raincheck recovers on average 77.7% and 60.4% of the quality lost to matched hard pruning on MultiVerse and ConvBench, respectively. On MultiVerse, the SGLang implementation reduces mean first-turn TTFT by up to 24.1% relative to full prefill, with less than 0.5% increase in mean time per output token (TPOT).

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.CL · cs.AI
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.02530

AMLBench: A Real-Incident Benchmark for Agentic Blockchain Anti-Money Laundering

Qishuang Fu, Hang Zheng, Yuchen Lei, Yuexin Xiang, Qin Wang, Yuanzhe Zhang, Shiping Chen, Andreas Deppeler 等 11 位作者

Tracing illicit funds on public blockchains remains largely manual. As funds move across accounts and undergo asset conversions, they become mixed with other inflows, requiring repeated queries and expert judgment to trace. Large language model (LLM) agents offer a way to automate this process, but their ability to reconstruct case-related transfer networks from limited clues remains unclear. To bridge this gap, we present AMLBench, an anti-money laundering (AML) benchmark built from 24 real-world cases and 5.05 million Ethereum transfer records. For each case, agents start from limited clues and explore these transfer records through composable transaction-query and fund-flow analysis tools, deciding which accounts and branches to pursue. The final tracing results are evaluated against case annotations, while tool interaction logs reveal how agents discover and select relevant transfers and at what resource cost. We also develop AMLAgent, which integrates fund-tracing guidance and query feedback to dynamically guide investigative decisions. With GPT-6 Astra, AMLAgent achieves macro averages of 80.82% transfer-level precision and 84.73% query coverage across 24 real-world cases. Further analysis of the large-scale Bybit case reveals substantial differences in transfer retention and token usage across models, even with similar submission precision. AMLBench establishes a reproducible benchmark for evaluating both tracing outcomes and investigative processes, laying the groundwork for more reliable and efficient autonomous AML investigations.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.CE
arXiv ↗PDF ↗