跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+2471新增论文
+2025其中 AI 相关
+163已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-11 04:56 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-10 15:22各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-10 05:35 — 2026-11-11 05:35(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-11 04:56最近发现新增版本:2026-11-10 15:22库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-10 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

20,643 已收录论文17,531 AI 相关5,643 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-11 04:55(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.12356

DForkTree: Accelerating Speculative Decoding with Fork-Aware Block Diffusion Draft Trees

Zhicheng Zheng, Cheng Zhang, Chenkai Tang

原文摘要

Speculative decoding speeds up language models by letting a lightweight drafter propose several future tokens that the target model verifies in parallel. Block diffusion drafters such as DFlash draft a whole block in one forward pass, and DDTree builds a draft tree from their per-position distributions. Each of these distributions assumes that the drafter's own most likely continuation is correct. A tree, however, gains over a chain only on branches that leave this continuation, where the drafter's top-1 accuracy drops from 89% to 18% and its candidate lists miss the right token far more often. When re-run from the fork token, the same drafter is usually correct, so the errors come from the prefix that the distributions condition on rather than from what the drafter knows. We introduce DForkTree, a training-free method that re-anchors each branch on its own tokens. DForkTree adds n-gram statistics from the target model's own outputs to the drafter's scores as pointwise mutual information, weights them more after the fork, and builds the optimal tree under these scores exactly on the GPU. On Qwen3.5-4B and 9B, with all tree methods sharing one drafter, tree pipeline and verifier, DForkTree is the fastest tree method on every benchmark. It is up to 41.5% faster than DFlash and 15.1% faster than DDTree in the same setting, with average speedups of up to 4.75x over autoregressive decoding.

cs.AI