As LLM-based agents develop, they have been increasingly applied in the legal domain. Legal Judgment Prediction~(LJP) requires models to conduct multi-step reasoning and external legal evidence retrieval. Existing legal search agents' performance is often constrained by the quality of retrieval queries. They often formulate queries directly from the initial user request, overlooking latent legal issues and legally salient details. To address this issue, we propose \emph{LegalEvolver}, a query optimization framework specifically designed to generate legally informative queries for LJP-oriented retrieval. Sampling high-quality optimized queries and their corresponding search trajectories is challenging, as relying solely on unguided high-temperature rollouts is both inefficient and constrained by the model's initial capabilities. We therefore heuristically optimize queries as seeds, improving the efficiency of trajectory generation. Furthermore, we summarize rollout experience into rubrics and use them to guide multi-round iterative self-evolution. Iteratively performing rubric optimization and rubric-guided RL enables the model to surpass its initial performance ceiling. End-to-end performance on extensive benchmarks demonstrates the effectiveness of query optimization on LJP. Comparisons with direct SFT followed by RL demonstrate the effectiveness of rubric guidance. Evolving rubrics further outperform fixed rubrics, confirming the benefits of self-evolution.
Xinyu Yang, Chenlong Deng Renmin University of China, Zhicheng Dou Renmin University of China
Legal judgment prediction serves as a pivotal task in intelligent judicial systems. Although large language models have achieved remarkable progress in general reasoning, they struggle with tasks that require fine-grained distinctions between similar charges. These models often select plausible charges directly without discriminating among closely related alternatives. In this paper, we introduce GLARE, an agentic legal reasoning framework that enables models to actively retrieve and apply external knowledge during decision-making. Unlike static prediction, GLARE simulates comparative reasoning by dynamically expanding the decision space to include confusing candidates, then retrieving exclusionary logic from precedents and statutes to identify the correct judgment. Experiments on real-world datasets show that our method significantly outperforms strong baselines, especially on complex cases involving confusing or rare charges. The code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/GLARE-LJP-8EDF.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL · cs.AI
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表