Chi Wang, Min Gao, Yifei Zhang, Bincheng Gu, Zongwei Wang, Wentao Li
Fake news undermines public trust and the integrity of online information ecosystems. Temporally disordered fake news is especially elusive because it rearranges factual events into a false chronology. Individual events may remain factually valid even when their temporal relations are misrepresented. When similar events involving the same entity recur, retrieval may return semantically plausible evidence from the wrong period. Consequently, independent event verification may rely on locally coherent but temporally mismatched evidence and incorrectly validate the article. We call this the \textit{evidence coherence trap}. Because existing benchmarks rarely isolate this setting, we construct ChronoFake, a source-disjoint benchmark of 30,706 articles derived from temporally anchored real events. It distinguishes temporal manipulation from valid narration, including flashbacks. To address this, we propose DelSA, a \underline{D}ocument S\underline{el}ection \underline{S}elf-Updating \underline{A}gent that iteratively refines evidence selection during training and applies a frozen rulebook for one-pass evidence selection at inference. DelSA uses an LLM to characterize candidate evidence, while a verifier-trained reranker balances local relevance against timeline consistency. Finally, the classifier compares the article-implied chronology extracted by the LLM with the evidence-derived chronology to reveal global temporal conflicts. DelSA outperforms existing methods on ChronoFake, while remaining competitive on PolitiFact and GossipCop.
Evaluating human-AI co-design requires testing whether coding agents can translate real users' multimodal requests into working application revisions. We introduce Co-Design Bench, a reference-free benchmark of 273 tasks curated from 37,463 deduplicated queries across 26,314 real user coding sessions. Its two tracks, Multimodal Editing (ME) and Repository Editing (RE), cover localized edits with optional image, audio, video, or document inputs and coordinated repository revisions. Tasks span three capability dimensions: Grounded Understanding, UI Transformation, and Functional Implementation. The tasks pair normalized requests and runnable pre-edit applications with 2,331 hidden expert-authored acceptance criteria. Our judge-then-refute protocol grades criteria using source and browser evidence, challenges positive verdicts with a separate LLM verifier, and audits visual and interaction claims without gold code or target screenshots. Under a shared agentic harness, the strongest of ten model endpoints passes an average of 69.9% of criteria per task but fully satisfies only 26.4% of tasks. All ten endpoints achieve lower criterion completion on repository edits spanning three or four change types than on those spanning one or two. Co-Design Bench provides a testbed for studying the gap between partial requirement satisfaction and complete task success under agentic execution for real-user application revisions.
Bingquan Zhang, Xiaoxiao Liu, Yuchi Wang, Zhou Lei freedomai, Qianqian Xie Wuhan University, Benyou Wang The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen
Standardized patients (SPs) are indispensable for clinical skills training but remain expensive and difficult to scale. Although large language model (LLM)-based virtual standardized patients (VSPs) have been proposed as an alternative, their behavior remains unstable and lacks rigorous comparison with human standardized patients. We propose EasyMED, a multi-agent VSP framework that separates case-grounded information disclosure from response generation to support stable, inquiry-conditioned patient behavior. We also introduce SPBench, a human-grounded benchmark with eight expert-defined criteria for interaction-level evaluation. Experiments show that EasyMED more closely matches human SP behavior than existing VSPs, particularly in case consistency and controlled disclosure. A four-week controlled study further demonstrates learning outcomes comparable to human SP training, with stronger early gains for novice learners and improved flexibility, psychological safety, and cost efficiency.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL · cs.MA
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表