Hankun Wang, Bohan Li, Shi Lian, Xiaoyu Gu, Jing Peng, Da Zheng, Yiwei Guo, Colin Zhang 等 10 位作者
Speech editing for content creation requires precise control over both what an edit should do and where it should apply. Free-form natural language provides a flexible interface for expressing edit requests, but its ambiguity may leave the intended operation, parameters, or target region underspecified. We study a semi-formal transcript-grounded edit instruction that specifies operation categories and parameters and binds them to transcript spans or boundaries. This semantic timeline avoids explicit timestamp alignment and provides an externally inspectable contract for compositional edits. We instantiate the interface in dots$.$tts$.$edit, a speech editing model built on a continuous autoregressive speech generation architecture. Four representative speech-creation controls cover lexical content, affective expression, pitch and speaking-rate delivery, and temporal phrasing through text, emotion, prosody, and pause editing. Task-specific data pipelines construct operation- and scope-controlled pairs while retaining source-derived context outside each target region. We further introduce doteBench, a bilingual benchmark that measures precise instruction following, local preservation, and audio quality across the four controls and their composition. Experiments show leading overall instruction following and local preservation across its five editing categories, while audio quality remains comparable to existing open-source systems. Across three Seed-TTS-Eval shards, the model shows negligible differences from the base model in zero-shot TTS recognition error rate and speaker similarity.
Xianda Zheng University of Auckland, Zijian Huang University of Auckland, Meng-Fen Chiang, Jiamou Liu The University of Auckland, Yuan Fang Singapore Management University, Michael J. Witbrock University of Auckland, Kaiqi Zhao Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen
Explicit knowledge conflicts, where retrieved contexts contain contradictory information, have become increasingly prevalent as Large Language Models (LLMs) integrate diverse data sources. The core challenge lies in the complexity of entangled narratives and the heterogeneity of conflict cases, which impose excessive demands on the reasoning capabilities of standard models. To address this, we propose Knowledge Conflict Reasoning (KCR), a framework that adjudicates conflicts by structuring the underlying logic. KCR first disentangles conflicting contexts into distinct sets of reasoning traces, utilizing both textual and graph-based representations, to simplify comprehension. It then employs a Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) paradigm, guiding the model to internalize a reasoning process that maximizes logical consistency while actively suppressing spurious reasoning paths derived from contradictory contexts. Extensive experiments demonstrate that KCR yields substantial improvements: a KCR-enhanced 7B model surpasses the performance of baselines equipped with top-tier closed-source models such as GPT-4o and GPT-5.1.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表
Xianda Zheng University of Auckland, Huan Gao, Meng-Fen Chiang, Michael J. Witbrock University of Auckland, Kaiqi Zhao Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen, Shangyang Li Beijing University of Post and Telecommunications
Despite recent progress, the reasoning capabilities of large multimodal language models (MLLMs) remain fundamentally constrained by static supervision, where fixed prompts, rules, or reward models provide non-adaptive guidance throughout training. Such static signals are often sufficient to enforce output formats, but fail to shape the underlying reasoning process, leading to brittle generalization and performance saturation in complex decision-making tasks. We propose Evo-PI, a principle-centric learning framework that treats reasoning principles as explicit, language-based supervision signals that can be generated, evaluated, and iteratively evolved. Instead of relying on fixed rewards, Evo-PI enables a co-evolutionary loop in which principles guide model reasoning, while model behaviors in turn refine the principles that supervise them. This dynamic alignment mechanism allows supervision to progressively adapt to the model’s reasoning deficiencies. We instantiate Evo-PI in medical visual question answering as a high-stakes testbed requiring structured visual–textual reasoning. Across eight benchmarks and multiple model backbones, Evo-PI consistently improves reasoning accuracy, achieving gains of up to 24.6%. Our results suggest that evolving principle-guided supervision offers a scalable and general paradigm for training expert-aligned reasoning in multimodal language models.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL · cs.CV
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表
Baochang Ren, Shuofei Qiao Zhejiang University, Ningyu Zhang Zhejiang University, Da Zheng Ant Group, Huajun Chen Zhejiang University and ZJU-Hangzhou Global Scientific and Technological Innovation Center
Slow-thinking Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong reasoning capabilities but often suffer from severe hallucinations due to an inability to recognize their knowledge boundaries. Existing Reinforcement Learning (RL) approaches typically rely on outcome-oriented rewards, which can inadvertently reinforce fabricated reasoning paths when the final answer is correct. To address this, we propose Knowledge-enhanced RL, KnowRL, a framework that integrates factual supervision directly into the reasoning process. By decomposing the chain of thought into atomic facts and verifying them against the corresponding ground-truth knowledge, KnowRL performs fine-grained checks to encourage models to reason faithfully. Crucially, this process-oriented supervision teaches the model to identify its knowledge boundaries, learning to say “I don’t know” instead of fabricating answers when information is missing. Experimental results demonstrate that KnowRL effectively mitigates hallucinations—reducing the Incorrect Rate on SimpleQA by 20.3% for distillation-based slow-thinking models while maintaining strong performance on complex reasoning benchmarks like GPQA and AIME 2025. Furthermore, our method shows robust transferability to out-of-distribution tasks, indicating that the model learns a generalizable verification behavior.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表
Yujie Luo, Zhuoyun Yu, Xuehai Wang, Yuqi Zhu Zhejiang University, Ningyu Zhang Zhejiang University, Lanning Wei AntGroup, Lun Du Ant Group, Da Zheng Ant Group 等 9 位作者
Replicating AI research is a crucial yet challenging task for large language model (LLM) agents. Existing approaches often struggle to generate executable code, primarily due to insufficient background knowledge and the limitations of retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) methods, which fail to capture latent technical details hidden in referenced papers. Furthermore, previous approaches tend to overlook valuable implementation-level code signals and lack structured knowledge representations that support multi-granular retrieval and reuse. To overcome these challenges, we propose Executable Knowledge Graphs (xKG), a pluggable, paper-centric knowledge base that automatically integrates code snippets and technical insights extracted from scientific literature. When integrated into three agent frameworks with two different LLMs, xKG shows substantial performance gains (10.9% with o3-mini) on PaperBench, demonstrating its effectiveness as a general and extensible solution for automated AI research replication.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表