Seokyong Sheem, Hochang Lee, Suyeong Lee, Daekyum Kim
原文摘要
Semantic knowledge is increasingly used to bridge heterogeneous schemas in tabular learning, but how much does that knowledge actually improve prediction? Studies in tabular learning commonly answer this question through semantic ablations that modify or suppress the supplied semantic knowledge. We show that these ablations can lead to misleading conclusions about predictive benefit: poor performance under altered semantics may be taken as evidence that the intended knowledge is beneficial. Across real and controlled experiments, altering semantic content can produce large performance differences even when the model gains little predictive benefit from having that semantic knowledge in the first place. To separate these effects, we distinguish two quantities: content sensitivity and predictive utility. Content sensitivity measures the change in performance when semantic content is altered, whereas predictive utility measures the benefit of the intended semantic knowledge relative to a suitable reference without that knowledge. This distinction motivates an evaluation framework in which the control is chosen according to the question being asked: altered controls assess sensitivity to semantic content, whereas claims that semantic knowledge improves prediction require a suitable reference. Even then, predictive utility is not fixed; it varies across suitable references and decreases when the reference can more easily recover the tested knowledge from other inputs or labeled examples. In a bounded audit of 25 semantic-ablation comparisons across nine studies, only one of 18 explicit predictive-utility claims is paired with a control that clearly isolates the tested semantic contribution. Together, these findings motivate a simple evaluation principle: semantic-ablation controls should be chosen and interpreted according to the question they are intended to answer.
Suyeong Lee, Hochang Lee, Seokyong Sheem, Daekyum Kim
原文摘要
Signal features derived from photoplethysmography (PPG) require different signal durations to characterize. Existing PPG foundation models treat duration as a pretraining or evaluation condition rather than using the different durations required by PPG features to organize self-supervision. We hypothesize that self-supervision should expand with signal duration, allowing a single encoder to progressively acquire additional features while preserving and reusing earlier learning. We introduce Retain-and-Extend PPG (RAE-PPG), which trains a single Transformer encoder successively on 10 s, 30 s, and 240 s inputs, adding supervision for signal features supported by each longer observation. The encoder is partitioned into duration-specific parameter groups, allowing later stages to reuse earlier groups while updating only the group assigned to the current stage. Selected earlier targets are reused to supervise later stages, encouraging the corresponding features to remain accessible in longer-input representations. Direct decoding from the final encoder shows that earlier features remain recoverable from longer-input representations, while later-stage features show higher mean decoding performance at their introduction durations. Controlled comparisons further show that prior-stage learning provides a better basis for learning newly introduced features at both transitions. Across 18 tasks from eight datasets, the final frozen encoder achieves the best observed score on 12 tasks compared with five existing PPG foundation models.