Xiaoke Yan, Jiaying Lei, Danqing Shi, Zichen Wang, Nan Cao
Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have enabled coding agents to autonomously perform complex software development tasks, yet their long-running execution remains difficult for users to inspect, understand, and steer. We present Vibetrace, an interactive trace visualization and intervention system for agentic programming built upon OpenCode. Vibetrace introduces a human-agent collaboration paradigm of Observe, Understand, Intervene, and Evolve. It (1) visualizes agent workflows as interactive execution traces for inspecting actions, intermediate states, and failures; (2) enables users to fork execution from prior steps and provide targeted corrections without restarting validated progress; and (3) distills traces and human feedback into reusable skills for continual agent evolution. On SWE-bench Verified, distilled skills reduce input tokens by 23.0% and cost by 15.5%, while improving pass rate from 65.0% to 68.0%. User studies further demonstrate improved accuracy and efficiency over conventional log-based interaction.
Human evaluation of AI-generated videos has so far relied on explicit human feedback, such as judgments or ratings. While these signals capture the conclusions viewers reach, they fail to offer insights into the perception that leads to them. This paper investigates eye tracking as a complementary human evaluation signal for AI-generated videos. We conducted two Visual Turing Test (VTT) experiments with a total of 90 participants on videos generated by latest generative models, in which participants watched each video twice and then gave their feedback. Across the experiments, we collected 4,286 valid eye-tracking trials on 438 videos. Our analysis indicates that gaze patterns offer informative evaluation signals that align with explicit human feedback. Building on the findings, we propose the first computational method GazeEval to predict the perceived visual realism of AI-generated videos from eye-tracking data. It achieves 71.3% accuracy in prediction, providing evidence that eye tracking data carries informative signals about how people evaluate a video. We release the study data to support further research on eye tracking for evaluating AI-generated video.