跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+2已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-08 10:17 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-08 06:02各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-07 12:34 — 2026-11-08 12:34(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-08 10:17最近发现新增版本:2026-11-08 06:02库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-06 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

17,100 已收录论文14,661 AI 相关4,057 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-08 10:15(北京时间)
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2604.13686

IndicDBBench - Benchmarking Multilingual Text-to-SQL Capabilities in Indian Languages

Aviral Dawar, Roshan Karanth, Vikram Goyal, Rakhee Kulshrestha, Sumanta Pasari, Dhruv Kumar

原文摘要

While Large Language Models (LLMs) have significantly advanced Text-to-SQL performance, existing benchmarks largely focus on Western contexts leaving a gap in real-world, non-Western applications. We introduce IndicDBBench, a comprehensive multilingual Text-to-SQL benchmark designed to evaluate cross-lingual semantic parsing across diverse Indic language families. The underlying schemas are derived from real-world open-data platforms (NDAP and IDP), ensuring realistic structural complexity. IndicDBBench comprises 20 databases spanning 237 tables. To construct complex relational structures from denormalized government data, we employ a three-agent pipeline (Architect, Auditor, Refiner), achieving high relational density (11.85 tables per database) and join depths of up to six. We generate 15,612 tasks spanning seven languages: English and six Indic languages, ensuring that queries are grounded in real database values and require multi-table reasoning. We evaluate state-of-the-art models, including DeepSeek V3.2, MiniMax M2.7, Llama 3.3, and Qwen3, across seven linguistic variants. Our results reveal a 9.0-point drop in execution accuracy from English to Indic languages, exposing an "Indic Gap" that, for the two models tested, persists even when gold tables and literal values are supplied, since this grounding raises accuracy in every language by similar amounts. The dataset and code are publicly available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/multilingualText2Sql-Indic--DDCC/

cs.CL · cs.AI · cs.DB

首次观测 · 记录 #1ACL Anthology · ACL 2026:acl:2026.acl-long.543ACL Anthology · ACL 2026

From Trust to Compromise: Outcome-Verified LLM Phishing Simulation and Real-Time Defense

Tulika Tewari BITS Pilani, Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Nalin Arachchilage, Jagat Sesh Challa BITS Pilani, Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Dhruv Kumar BITS Pilani, Birla Institute of Technology and Science

原文摘要

Large Language Models (LLMs) excel as conversational agents. However, these capabilities can be weaponized to automate social engineering attacks that gradually build rapport to compromise the online safety of users. To understand this, researchers have simulated LLM-based attacks in controlled settings. However, the existing simulators focus on just Personal Identifiable Information (PII) requests within the chat. Thus, to represent a complete attack scenario, we introduce PhishSim, an outcome-driven LLM-based phishing simulator that verifies compromise by simulating a victim completing an external action step, such as submitting credentials on a malicious platform. This enables the generation of diverse, multi-turn attack trajectories. Building on these trajectories, we position PhishGate as a practical mitigation baseline for outcome-grounded conversational phishing: a real-time multi-agent risk scorer that detects manipulation tactics and estimates the severity of ongoing chats. For ambiguous cases, it invokes RAG-supported consistency checks. Evaluating four state-of-the-art LLM backends in a real-time setting, we find that PhishGate improves dialogue-level detection over a real-time baseline. Our results highlight both the promise and brittleness of LLM-based real-time phishing defense, providing an outcome-grounded testbed for studying conversational compromise.

cs.CL · cs.MA

Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表