跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+1072新增论文
+845其中 AI 相关
+94已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-09 16:31 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-09 13:22各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-08 17:38 — 2026-11-09 17:38(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-09 16:31最近发现新增版本:2026-11-09 13:22库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-07 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

18,172 已收录论文15,506 AI 相关4,527 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-09 16:29(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.09411

DataHelix: A CPU-GPU Co-Scheduling Data Plane for Multimodal Model Training

Yuanhe Li, Jiazhen Wu, Dian Ding, Guangtao Xue, Yiming Zhang

原文摘要

Multimodal model training breaks the loose coupling between data loading and model execution assumed by conventional training pipelines. Large per-sample variation in decoding cost, token/latent count, and tensor size causes both CPU preprocessing time and GPU compute time to vary substantially across data-parallel ranks (training processes). In synchronous training, these two sources of heterogeneity interact tightly: GPU execution determines how long the input pipeline has to prepare the next batch, while delayed preprocessing in any rank in turn stalls all GPUs at synchronization. As a result, optimizing CPU throughput or GPU load balance in isolation cannot eliminate pipeline bubbles. We present DataHelix, a metadata-first CPU-GPU co-scheduling data plane for multimodal training. DataHelix jointly reasons about preprocessing demand and GPU execution progress, treating each GPU compute window as the readiness budget for the next batch and coordinating preprocessing across ranks to minimize deadline misses rather than CPU makespan. To avoid expensive data movement, placement is decided while samples remain lightweight descriptors, before decoding and collation amplify them into large tensors. Descriptor-level token-latent-aware batching performs coarse pre-balancing, while cost-gated collective rebalancing corrects residual skew only when its expected benefit exceeds transfer cost. Across 11 video and multimodal workloads on 8 Ascend 910B accelerators, DataHelix reduces mean deadline-miss rate by 67.8% and mean p95 input-wait latency by 87.0%, while achieving 2.72x geometric-mean throughput over rank-local DataLoaders and 1.82x over a Ray actor pool under the same CPU budget.

cs.DC · cs.AI