跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+1072新增论文
+845其中 AI 相关
+94已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-10 09:10 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-09 13:22各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-09 09:27 — 2026-11-10 09:27(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-10 09:10最近发现新增版本:2026-11-09 13:22库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-07 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

18,172 已收录论文15,506 AI 相关4,527 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-10 09:09(北京时间)
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2503.21049

On the Hardness Hierarchy for the $O(n \sqrt{\log n})$ Complexity in the Word RAM

Dominik Kempa, Tomasz Kociumaka

原文摘要

We study the relative hardness of fundamental problems with state-of-the-art word RAM algorithms that take $O(n\sqrt{\log n})$ time for instances described in $Θ(n)$ machine words ($Θ(n\log n)$ bits). This complexity class, one of six hardness levels identified by Chan and Pătraşcu [SODA 2010], includes problems from several domains: Counting Inversions, string processing problems (BWT Construction, LZ77 Factorization, Longest Common Substring, Batched Longest Previous Factor Queries, Batched Inverse Suffix Array Queries), and computational geometry tasks (Orthogonal Range Counting, Orthogonal Segment Intersection Counting). We offer two main contributions: We establish new links between the above string problems and Dictionary Matching, a classic task solvable using the Aho-Corasick automaton. We restrict Dictionary Matching to instances with $Θ(n)$ binary patterns of length $m = Θ(\log n)$ each, and we prove that, unless these instances can be solved in $o(n\sqrt{\log n})$ time, the aforementioned string problems cannot be solved faster either. Via further reductions, we extend this hardness to Counting Inversions (a fundamental component in geometric algorithms) and thus to Orthogonal Range Counting and Orthogonal Segment Intersection Counting. This hinges on String Nesting, a new problem which is equivalent to Dictionary Matching and can be reduced to Counting Inversions in three steps. Together, our results unveil a single problem, with two equivalent formulations, that underlies the hardness of nearly all major problems currently occupying the $O(n\sqrt{\log n})$ level of hardness. These results drastically funnel further efforts to improve the complexity of near-linear problems. As an auxiliary outcome of our framework, we also prove that several central string problems can be efficiently reduced to their versions over the binary alphabet.

cs.DS

版本更新 · v2arXiv:2608.19172

Cell-Probe Lower Bounds and Complexity-Preserving Reductions for Suffix Array Queries

Dominik Kempa, Tomasz Kociumaka

原文摘要

For a text $T$ of length $n$ over an alphabet of size $σ$, its suffix array lists the starting positions of the suffixes of $T$ in lexicographic order, and its inverse suffix array gives the lexicographic rank of the suffix starting at each position. Since the introduction of the FM-index and the compressed suffix array in 2000, both queries have been supported in $O((\log_σn)^ε)$ time using $O(n\logσ)$ bits, for any constant $ε>0$. Yet no nontrivial time-space lower bound for suffix-array queries in compact space was known. We give the first such lower bound: in the cell-probe model with $Θ(\log n)$-bit words, every deterministic $S$-bit data structure with $S\ge n$ answering suffix-array queries on binary strings of length at most $n$ has worst-case query time $Ω(\log\log n/\log((S/n)\log\log n))$. Hence, structures with $O(n(\log\log n)^{O(1)})$ bits need $Ω(\log\log n/\log\log\log n)$ query time, while constant query time requires $Ω(n\log^εn)$ bits for some constant $ε>0$, matching known upper bounds. In particular, no such $O(n)$-bit structure supports constant-time queries, answering the 25-year-old question of Grossi and Vitter. We also give exact complexity-preserving equivalences between suffix-array access and simpler prefix queries on short strings. For every $2\leqσ\leq n$, suffix-array queries are equivalent to prefix-select queries, and inverse-suffix-array queries are equivalent to prefix-special-rank queries. The reductions in both directions preserve all four standard measures up to constant factors: space, query time, preprocessing time, and preprocessing space. Unlike previous reductions, they incur no additive $O(\log\log n)$ query-time term. Thus, the corresponding prefix-query problems capture suffix-array and inverse-suffix-array access without asymptotic loss in any of the four measures.

cs.DS